Why no, vector artwork is not universally superior for lines

I’m cook­ing up a book­let for a study camp at the minute that has a sim­ple grid-lines (ruled maths paper) back­ground and ini­tially traced it with Illus­tra­tor because it looked, err, lin­ear enough to be a fair can­di­date for such work.

The trace had to be a lit­tle eclec­tic for realism’s sake, so I didn’t just do the redraw with Ctrl + D trans­form ninja skills, but let the soft­ware trace it. Big mistake.

It was one of those things that InDe­sign got a lit­tle upset about the com­plex­ity of — which is okay — and had to import as encap­su­lated post­script instead of as native vec­tor data — which is also okay. Trou­ble was, it wasn’t just bor­der­line too-complex, it was stu­pidly over the edge. I stuck it on the A-Master (which keeps me sane and the .indd file­size down) and got to work for about a week on the rest of the con­tent and so forth. As we get closer to press (I was aim­ing for today… oth­ers appar­netly have dif­fer­ent ideas) I’ve started doing the Indd->PDF shuf­fle and dis­cov­ered the absolute pain of wait­ing for it to “ren­der” (basi­cally that’s what it’s doing) the EPS onto every page as it cre­ates the PDF file.

I endured this for about two days and then finally snapped this morn­ing, went back to Pho­to­shop with the source image and processed it to make it look sim­i­lar enough before past­ing the raster scan into the A-Master in the traced thing’s place.

As if by magic, the gen­er­ated PDF size dropped from 55MB to under 4MB.

Raster images are your friend.

p.s. hope­fully I’m back here now. Am away next week with GPRS Inter­net only, then in New Zealand (with Inter­net, albeit with uncer­tainty about hav­ing a com­puter in the accom­mo­da­tion). Yes, busy as ever. On Face­book quite a lot, because sta­tus updates are more man­agable than full blog posts!

Tags: , , , ,

posted on Monday, June 18th, 2007 at 7:50 pm by Josh Street, filed under Design.

Leave a Reply