<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Situatedness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/</link>
	<description>Web, English, 中国, and various geekosity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 03:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sat</title>
		<link>http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/#comment-326513</link>
		<dc:creator>sat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/#comment-326513</guid>
		<description>Come to think of it, what’s actu­ally annoy­ing is the severe lim­i­ta­tions of the Word dic­tio­nary. Surely it’s not that dif­fi­cult to make a dic­tio­nary, that rather than a giant look-up list (as it appears to be) applies rules. Thus, it would know that ‘ness’ is a legit­i­mate suf­fix to ‘sit­u­ated’, and not have the stu­pid red squig­gle under it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it, what’s actu­ally annoy­ing is the severe lim­i­ta­tions of the Word dic­tio­nary. Surely it’s not that dif­fi­cult to make a dic­tio­nary, that rather than a giant look-up list (as it appears to be) applies rules. Thus, it would know that ‘ness’ is a legit­i­mate suf­fix to ‘sit­u­ated’, and not have the stu­pid red squig­gle under it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Yoshi</title>
		<link>http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/#comment-321049</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Yoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josh.st/2009/10/12/situatedness/#comment-321049</guid>
		<description>&#039;Situatedness&#039; is not a made up word. It&#039;s an uncommon, legitimate extension of the word &#039;situated&#039;. Actually making up words, I&#039;m prepared to bet, is rather rare? As for uncommon extensions, I make them all the time. Sometimes to be deliberately annoying, but mostly because I&#039;m writing something and it just seems to be the most appropriate word...

Come to think of it, what&#039;s actually annoying is the severe limitations of the Word dictionary. Surely it&#039;s not that difficult to make a dictionary, that rather than a giant look-up list (as it appears to be) applies rules. Thus, it would know that &#039;ness&#039; is a legitimate suffix to &#039;situated&#039;, and not have the stupid red squiggle under it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘Situatedness’ is not a made up word. It’s an uncommon, legitimate extension of the word ‘situated’. Actually making up words, I’m prepared to bet, is rather rare? As for uncommon extensions, I make them all the time. Sometimes to be deliberately annoying, but mostly because I’m writing something and it just seems to be the most appropriate word…</p>
<p>Come to think of it, what’s actually annoying is the severe limitations of the Word dictionary. Surely it’s not that difficult to make a dictionary, that rather than a giant look-up list (as it appears to be) applies rules. Thus, it would know that ‘ness’ is a legitimate suffix to ‘situated’, and not have the stupid red squiggle under it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: josh.st @ 2012-05-23 09:19:02 -->
