Free press in fragile situations

In a ret­ro­spec­tive piece in the SMH con­cern­ing a new pub­li­ca­tion out of the Uni­ver­sity of Mel­bourne deal­ing with how media work­ers responded to and processed last year’s Black Sat­ur­day fires, Mallesons IP part­ner Natalie Hickey writes (among other things) that “It is worth reflect­ing that a healthy democ­racy does not need free speech at all costs. Words can wound and infor­ma­tion can cause pain.”

What a realisation!

So often in our tabloid, syndicated-to-the-hilt, visu­ally ori­ented, and, of course, com­mer­cially dri­ven media the objec­tive of “the public’s right to know” is utilised as an over­rid­ing jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for pub­li­ca­tion of con­tent that, sim­ply, is unnec­es­sary for the pub­lic and unhelp­ful for those it concerns.

In the Bible, a king called David writes, “You love all words that devour, O deceit­ful tongue.” Words can wound, and infor­ma­tion can cause pain — and so often our media will “love evil more than good, and lying more than speak­ing what is right.” (Also David, Psalm 52) The defense that it rates well is inad­e­quate, yet it is enthralling to dis­cover a gen­uine dis­cus­sion of jour­nal­is­tic ethics that reflects bib­li­cal truth about speech.

God teaches that Chris­t­ian peo­ple are to speak the truth in love, and that, what­ever other abil­i­ties we may have been given by Him, if we don’t exer­cise those with love, we have noth­ing. Oh, that our press would oper­ate on this basis — to do so would serve the “pub­lic inter­est” well!

# by Josh on January 19th, 2010 Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
|
No Comments »

So you think Social Media’s a fad?

This video goes some way to dis­pelling that myth. Some of the sta­tis­tics appear hyper­bolic or dubi­ously ver­i­fied, and as with much con­tent on YouTube it avoids any form of rig­or­ous ref­er­enc­ing, but enough of it is true that it stands regardless.

# by Josh on December 2nd, 2009 Tags: , , , ,
|
No Comments »

Growling at PayPal

We signed up for a Pay­Pal account ages ago and never got around to using to process pay­ments (we’ve got a mer­chant facil­ity with Comm­Bank so there was no great urgency to the situation) — and since set­ting it up the per­son respon­si­ble has moved on.

Our unver­i­fied account has never processed a sin­gle pay­ment, and yet with the amount of ID they require for some­thing as sim­ple as a con­tact name change you could get a pass­port in some countries.

Busi­ness Con­tact Name Change
To process your name change request, you need to fax in addi­tional infor­ma­tion. Please pro­vide a cur­rent photo iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and one of the other fol­low­ing documents:

  • A copy of a valid photo iden­ti­fi­ca­tion show­ing your new name.
  • Accept­able forms of photo iden­ti­fi­ca­tion are a driver’s license, pass­port or any other state or gov­ern­ment issued photo identification.
  • A copy of a recent util­ity bill show­ing your new name and address exactly as they appear on your Pay­Pal account.
  • A copy of a recent bank state­ment for the bank account listed on your Pay­Pal account (if applicable).

Please include a let­ter on com­pany sta­tionery indi­cat­ing the pri­mary email address, cur­rent name, address and tele­phone num­ber on the Pay­Pal account, the rea­son for the name change, and the new busi­ness con­tact name.

So that we can process your request effi­ciently, please ensure that your doc­u­ments are valid and leg­i­ble. As always, any per­sonal iden­ti­fi­ca­tion infor­ma­tion that you sub­mit to Pay­Pal will remain secure and will never be trans­mit­ted to any third party.

Pay­Pal have never had a rep as a par­tic­u­larly cus­tomer friendly organ­i­sa­tion, but this isn’t even ben­e­fi­cial to them! With no trans­ac­tions in the past and less doc­u­men­ta­tion than this required for estab­lish­ing a NEW account it doesn’t pose any cred­i­ble threat so far as hijacked accounts/money laundering/whatever goes, and they need to spend time review­ing doc­u­ments sent in a thor­oughly non­stan­dard way. The bank account ver­i­fi­ca­tion process is pretty good in terms of automa­tion (albeit risky — you’re essen­tially giv­ing Pay­Pal license to do what­ever with all funds in that account) — this is most cer­tainly not.

Any­one have any good, low % fee or cost/transaction way of hook­ing into CBA’s Evolve sys­tem? The appli­ca­tion doesn’t war­rant us spend­ing heaps set­ting it up just yet, and Pay­Pal are good at mak­ing things way too risky and dif­fi­cult. Grumble.

Sundae lies

From Tori

Tonight while dri­ving me home, Josh and I stopped at Mac­cas and bought a choco­late sun­dae. He asked me whether there are McFlur­ries in China and I said yes. He was glad, and joked that this isn’t some­thing he’d be will­ing to give up for Jesus. We laughed, because this isn’t true. We both would give up much more than McDonald’s ice­creams for Jesus. I love this boy.

# by Josh on October 12th, 2009 Tags: , , , , , ,
|
No Comments »

Situatedness

Note to aca­d­e­mics. Just read an arti­cle that uses the word “sit­u­at­ed­ness” with­out any good rea­son. Stop invent­ing words when you don’t need to. Espe­cially if you’re in a scarcely estab­lished field that already strug­gles to jus­tify its exis­tence as a unique dis­ci­pline. Invent­ing words doesn’t aid your cause — if any­thing, your weak attempts at estab­lish­ing a jar­gon for your­selves serves only to high­light your ten­u­ous exis­tence out­side the para­me­ters of estab­lished fields. Praxis is where this all falls apart on you, so stop mak­ing up words and go do some real research to back up your mediocre method­olo­gies. When you’re beaten to the punch by both com­mer­cial / non-profit util­i­ties in devel­op­ing not only method­olo­gies but also tools for the same analy­ses you’re flog­ging as your own, it’s time to go and fold back into the dis­ci­plines from whence you came and stop pre­tend­ing to be some­thing new.

*ahem*

Well, that feels bet­ter. But I still need to write about it :(

# by Josh on October 12th, 2009 Tags: , , , , , ,
|
1 Comment »

Red

Dust storm over Sydney @ University of New South Wales

Sydney’s cov­ered in a dust storm this morn­ing and everyone’s talk­ing about it. It’s pretty funky coloured and unprece­dented in recorded his­tory. Tori says Thank God in her new blog (at least, that’s the blog’s focus :)) — oth­ers say more amus­ing things. Here’s a sample.

““UFO?” — my brother, “no, dust storm” — me. He looked upset.”

“[name] proudly wel­comes you to Syd­ney Ranga Day. You can’t see us, but you know we’re out there.”

“[name] would hate to be hold­ing a cli­mate change deniers press con­fer­ence in Syd­ney today.”

“Appar­ently you shouldnt go out­side if u have asthma” [sic] — stat­ing the obvi­ous award

“[name] won­ders if, due to global warm­ing, jesus will return on a cloud of orange dust?”

“[name] is won­der­ing how he got inside a sepia photo?!”

“[name] wants it to rain so she can make a mud pie on her car”

Hey guys i had this big bag of red dust that i left out­side, but how [sic] can’t find it. Would any­one know where it is?”

# by Josh on September 23rd, 2009 Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
|
No Comments »

CMYK thumbnailing of JPEGs with Gmail/Google Mail

I peri­od­i­cally freak out when review­ing emails that I’ve sent, par­tic­u­larly to print­ers, using Gmail’s (hosted apps) web­mail inter­face. It has this habit of con­vert­ing CMYK JPGs to RGB thumb­nails really badly — but with­out appar­ent corruption.

Gmail getting CMYK thumbnails wrong

The blue in the image above is actu­ally a deep red!

Accord­ingly, while the colours are totally out of whack, there are no other arti­facts in the image. Nor­mally this just looks weird — some­times, in the case of logo vari­ants, it looks plau­si­ble but utterly incor­rect! My guess is they’re using an older ver­sion of PIL (we all know how much Google loves Python) prior to this March 2009 patch. Sounds like the same phenomenon.

Still, those peo­ple email­ing CMYK JPGs has to be a lit­tle bit niche, so I’m not heaps hope­ful of this get­ting fixed too soon! The main rea­son I care is because web inter­faces are so much faster than retriev­ing large attach­ments from IMAP stores.

# by Josh on September 16th, 2009 Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
|
No Comments »