Legal DRM-free music

I haven’t been this con­fused over a cool Inter­net ser­vice… prob­a­bly ever. AmazonMP3 is simul­ta­ne­ously one of the most excit­ing things to hap­pen in online music ever, and a source of great per­sonal confusion.

I want to use it (and will) because it’s freak­ing awesome. The bitrate thing doesn’t mas­sively con­cern me… gen­er­ally speak­ing, I can’t tell the dif­fer­ence (though I will con­tinue to rip my CDs as loss­less, mostly in case I lose them). What con­cerns me is the poten­tial under­min­ing of my CD-store perus­ing ways as a result! I haven’t had to con­sider this until now because main­stream music sim­ply hasn’t been avail­able in a rel­a­tively open (don’t give me crap about MP3 patents, any­one can read them), DRM-free format.

It ships with art­work but that so doesn’t count.

Oh, so appar­ently this post was a waste of time. Of course, it’s only licensed for US sales. I don’t know why that didn’t occur to me, but it didn’t. Now I’m grumpy. And irra­tionally crav­ing popcorn.

Well, if you’re in the US and using iTunes… stop. This is pretty cool for you guys, mean­while I’ll keep buy­ing my grey-market imported CDs (which is com­pletely legal in Aus­tralia and morally fine). All that’s stand­ing between me and Amazon’s MP3 music is a US ship­ping address for invoices, pre­sum­ably, so I totally could just make one up. Not break­ing any law that I’m under there. But what­ever, it’s all too messy.

Yeah, that’s right, record com­pa­nies screwed it up again.

We’ll get there, one day…

# by Josh on September 26th, 2007 Tags: , , , , ,
| 2 Comments »

Ringle?

Oh, some­one please stop these peo­ple. Even my Sony Eric­s­son (yes, half owned by a noto­ri­ously evil record label) ships with soft­ware to rip CDs into non-DRM’d MP3s that func­tion just fine as ring­tones. What star­tling level of idiocy causes some­one to think that bundling more soft­ware on CDs is a remotely good idea I can­not fathom, but clearly one of the brains in a record com­pany came up with this gem. It doesn’t really affect me on account of pretty much never buy­ing CD sin­gles, but even so… yuck.

If this ever finds its way onto real CDs (i.e. albums), I may just cry. I prob­a­bly spend in the vicin­ity of AU$60 – 75 a month on new albums, which is likely more rev­enue than you’d get if I bought things online… and I reckon a good half the rea­son I do that (aside from know­ing what DRM is and why I don’t want it on my music) is for the pack­ag­ing and asso­ci­ated retail experience. Most recent pur­chases include Gotye’s Mixed Blood, MoS Australia’s Elec­tro House Ses­sions (it’s com­pletely dif­fer­ent from the global MoS release of the same name), Bob Sinclar’s Soundz of Free­dom, and the super duper excel­lent sound­track to Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest.

I have ripped each and every track from them all as WMA Loss­less. I wouldn’t have bought… about three of the four… if it wasn’t for retail CD stores.

Absurdly cheap lighting console

If any­one has a spare grand sit­ting around they feel like spend­ing this lovely evening, there’s a just-serviced LSC Axiom 36/72 light­ing con­sole going on eBay in a bit over 3 ½ hours. In Mel­bourne, but with road­case included. I’d buy it, but I’m broke… some­thing to do with not being able to do any real work on account of try­ing to get *nix setup for­ever. Ubuntu is per­fect, but for the fact that it wouldn’t con­sider boot­ing for me for some rea­son. Blame VIA/EPIA for their clone low-power hard­ware, methinks.

# by Josh on August 1st, 2007 Tags: , , ,
| 2 Comments »

PLAY! A video game symphony

Geek­ing tonight was awe­some. Never seen so many nerds in the one place. Need to get out (to nerd gath­er­ings) more! Con­duc­tor was Arnie Roth, who was vaguely annoy­ing but pos­si­bly only on account of his American-ness and the fact that some­one gave him a micro­phone, and we all know giv­ing con­duc­tors mics is invari­ably a BadIdea™. Akira Yamaoka had some crazy part to play with an elec­tric gui­tar (they only used one mic on his amp, I was appalled!)… he was dressed quite inter­est­ingly. I sug­gested I adopt his fash­ion sense (because, invari­ably, mine is lack­ing!) and was promptly shut down by Claudia.

Video was annoy­ingly bad in the entire first half, because the vision switch­ing was rub­bish, the cam­eras were inap­pro­pri­ate for the task, and the cam­era ops had not the fog­gi­est idea how to pull focus, adjust iris, or obey cues. Alter­na­tively, the per­son call­ing the show was just really bad at let­ting peo­ple know when they were clear to start mov­ing. I’d say some­where between the two. Given there were only four live vision sources by my count (cen­tre at audio desk, cen­tre right (stage left), stage right, organ loft) it’s not exactly as though it should’ve been too com­pli­cated. The first two were house cam­eras and gen­er­ally pretty okay. The third was an XL-1 or –2, whilst the cam­era at the organ was prob­a­bly a XM or maybe a com­pact Pana­sonic cam­era. Both cam­eras 3 and 4 had seri­ous aper­ture issues. The third was often too dark (fail­ing to com­pen­sate for dim light­ing in the room), whilst the fourth was waaay too far open. Appar­ently some­one must have set it up when house lights were on and the organ was not: accord­ingly, it was absurdly bright against the other 3 cam­eras (zebra bars, anyone?).

Part of the issue also stemmed from hav­ing two dif­fer­ent classes of pro­jec­tor in use in a con­fig­u­ra­tion where the pri­mary screen (called A) is ~18x9” and two sec­on­daries (col­lec­tively, B) are per­haps half the pri­mary screen’s dimen­sions (that is, a quar­ter of its size). All three were rear-project and I’d imag­ine that pro­jec­tor A was vastly more pow­er­ful than pro­jec­tors B. Accord­ingly, cam­era 4 appeared on B with­out los­ing details, while on A the sheet music was a vast white expanse. This is why it’s impor­tant for video nerds to look out­side their lit­tle con­trol booth some­times — pre­view mon­i­tors lie.  Also, the larger screen was one of the dirt­ier fast-folds I’ve seen used, with clearly vis­i­ble lines three-by-two across it becom­ing espe­cially appar­ent in bright, high-motion segments.

Some­how video redeemed itself in the sec­ond half (maybe dif­fer­ent cam­era­men, maybe the per­son call­ing shots got a clue in inter­mis­sion, or maybe my hyper­crit­i­cal­ness sub­sided some­what), but I wasn’t left amaz­ingly impressed.

Light­ing, on the other hand… delight­ful. Eight 5kW fres­nels with Colourset scrollers gave a nice wash to the stage above and beyond what the (more) intel­li­gent fix­tures could pro­vide. I couldn’t pick the movers on the back bar, but I’d ven­ture a guess at MAC600’s for the sides. Also four per side, as with the fres­nels. Five along the back bar, though I’m quite sure they were a dif­fer­ent kind of fix­ture. Light­ing didn’t help out the cheap Canon video cam­eras, though the house cam­eras dealt with it admirably… there were a few really beau­ti­ful shots in there from those two.

Audio worked. The 6.1 (which I read about some­where but now can’t find, and for which there were puncy lit­tle speak­ers about the size of SX100’s set up in their appro­pri­ate posi­tions) was use­ful for drown­ing out the organ at one point and mak­ing per­cus­sion come from weird direc­tions, but other than that I didn’t par­tic­u­larly notice it. Which is good. Either they weren’t using it, or the sound was just swal­lowed by the room. Quite a lot of mics and those sound par­ti­tiony things (they surely have a name, but I don’t know it), which would tend to indi­cate they were being quite ambi­tious about either record­ing the con­cert or mix­ing to sur­round and didn’t want audio leak­ing between micro­phones. Hence (in part) my frus­tra­tion at the sin­gle mic on Yamaoka’s amp… redun­dancy is impor­tant where one instru­ment is that impor­tant, espe­cially in a high-traffic area like that (con­duc­tor walks around more than any­one else on stage). There’s always the pos­si­bil­ity to re-set mics in inter­mis­sion, but if either Yamaoka or the con­duc­tor were to knock it on enter­ing after the inter­mis­sion? Stuffed. It was a decent sized amp, but it’d hardly carry through­out the build­ing very well. Aside from that… well, I don’t really know what I’m talk­ing about with audio, any­way. It sounded good.

I shocked myself by remem­ber­ing large swathes of Zelda. This makes me think I must’ve had Butterfly-Effect-esque black­outs in my child­hood, but oh well. I’ve also decided I want to buy a Dream­cast, dif­fi­cult though that may prove, because I really wanted one when they first came out (on account of that whole Linux thing, Inter­net con­nec­tiv­ity, the brand’s rel­a­tive inno­cence — hey, maybe that’s why it’s gone now –, and a hand­ful of deli­cious look­ing screen­shots from games which got great reviews) and never got around to it before they stopped mak­ing them.

Kon­ami are morons. Every­one else gives their game footage gratis, quite rea­son­ably under­stand­ing that such cov­er­age is only going to boost the value of their brand, yet Kon­ami appar­ently insisted on a water­mark on some footage pro­vided. I’ve never been a fan of many of their games any­way, but that water­mark pissed me off enough that I’m exceed­ingly glad they’re mostly stuck in arcades with aging pic­ture tube con­soles, any­way. About the same decade as their mar­ket­ing saaviness.

As much as I will always whine about any­thing visual (I “enjoy” or “dis­like” reg­u­lar con­certs with­out too much analy­sis, because I can’t), it was a good night. It made me miss pro­duc­tions enor­mously (live vision espe­cially), which is funny because I think the desired effect was to make peo­ple miss video games instead. Claud had fun laugh­ing at the geeks get­ting all dressed up. We both laughed as cer­tain mem­bers of the audi­ence were baf­fled by per­for­mance con­ven­tions! All in good fun.

Too much nostalgia for a computer

What fol­lows is writ­ten far less well than it deserves, but — iron­i­cally — I’m drown­ing in other work at present. This needed writ­ing sooner than other things did.

Michael’s pulling the plug on the server that this web­site has run on since 2003.

The ‘server’ has changed dra­mat­i­cally in con­sti­tu­tion since it all began way back when, but… wow. An aston­ish­ingly large part of my teenage years. For the longest time, it seemed as though the Inter­net had alto­gether ceased to exist every­time Dale’s con­nec­tion went out. In the early days, we were all run­ning servers on port 1200 to cir­cum­vent ISP restric­tions on port 80. phpBB was the order of the day, run­ning Apache — on a pirated copy of Win­dows 2000 (those were the days in which “legit­mate soft­ware” con­sti­tuted an oxy­moron). Oper­at­ing on an early ADSL link with 64kbps upload, forum emoti­cons were hosted on free web space pro­vided by iiNet in order to con­serve band­width. You laugh now, but the speed boost was incred­i­ble. Every time iiNet dropped out (to future read­ers: that’s what hap­pens when the inter­net goes out for a cou­ple of hours, none of this occa­sional con­nec­tion time-out rub­bish), an irate explana­tory post from mwd­meyer would emerge and life would con­tinue as nor­mal. Until par­ents dis­cov­ered the server run­ning and turned it off again, which would spark an effort to con­ceal yet another com­puter in a room crowded full of equip­ment. About halfway through 2004, they gave up searching.

These were the days (for me) of NE2000 clones pow­er­ing Smoothwall/m0n0wall routers, recy­cling hard­ware, a sub­scrip­tion to Atomic before all the other kids (I bought more geeky mag­a­zines than any­one I know – I think it was that strange meet­ing place of compters, cre­ativ­ity, and cant that I later became com­fort­able with), when GeForce 2’s and Pen­tium 4’s (the first ones with RDRAM that every­one despised) and DDR-supporting Athlons were still zippy. When frame-based redi­rects passed for domain names — .tk, anyone?

Mostly, it was about the forums… but as for per­sonal pub­lish­ing, this was no small resource. My first dynamic web­site was a blog hosted on that server — I don’t think it yet had a name — we all rolled our own web soft­ware in those days (it’s not that long ago). Some of us still do. The first domain name acquired was Dale’s, in March 2004, co-inciding (more or less) with the forums’ first birth­day. Twelve US dol­lars later (Joker.com’s prices still haven’t changed), we were all still using frame-based redi­rects — sta­tic IPs were the stuff of pipe-dreams, and Dynamic DNS, though around, was out­side of the expe­ri­ence of most of us. Steve ran a notoriously-flaky IIS server with real domains and Exchange, but paid about $150 a month for the priv­i­lege: sta­tic IPs being avail­able only on busi­ness grade inter­net connections.

These are mere details. The forums them­selves con­sti­tute an amaz­ing chron­i­cle of the lives of mwd­meyer, ucosty, Sammy, i_am_a_n00bie, Smile:), smKz, n|cktangents, angelicde­ity, baibai, Sphinx^, lud­vikas, and a hand­ful of oth­ers over a fairly tumul­tuous time. There is so much not recorded explic­itly that sur­rounds the nearly 16,000 mes­sages from these eleven users alone. Some has been sup­pressed, other parts for­got­ten, but all of it inex­tri­ca­bly linked together in the momen­tum of time. There are some things about that time which will never be shared with those who weren’t around.

The forums didn’t sur­vive post-school. This shouldn’t be sur­pris­ing, given the amount of research that says this will be the case for any given rela­tion­ships faced with that man­ner of tran­si­tion, but it was still bizarre wit­ness­ing what would have been sev­eral months of time spent on a sin­gle web­site evap­o­rate into (not much). The server moved from Bal­main to Mar­ian Street, even­tu­ally find­ing its way into a rack there. This is where things get hazy for me. I think the last time I saw Michael might’ve been New Years’ Eve 2005/2006… I feel some sense of guilt about that, but recog­nise mutual busy-ness had a role such that nei­ther of us should be blamed alone. I don’t believe that a blame­less “but things changed” is ever suf­fi­cient when talk­ing about close rela­tion­ships. I’m fairly cer­tain my clos­est friend for about two years at school is some­one that I no longer have any­thing to do with, but can’t explain why. And I know that I can’t in any way blame him, because I’m so guilty of fail­ing to keep work­ing on rela­tion­ships myself.

I sup­pose the point of all this is that the com­puter for­mally known as ‘Metro’, now ‘Loki’ (I don’t know how it got that name — Loki to me is an amaz­ing con­trib­u­tor to Linux-based gam­ing, 2000 – 2002 RIP, but it could just as eas­ily have been named after the Norse trick­ster and Odin’s wily accom­plice!) isn’t just the lat­est in a series of bits of elec­tronic gear that some markup and pix­els have been piped off for a cou­ple of years. This is just one step closer to a com­plete clo­sure of a very large chap­ter of my life… and, yeah, that’s incred­i­bly sad.

Please don’t for a minute con­sider this to be my argu­ing that Loki should stay switched on — it’s about some­thing far greater and more per­sonal than a star­tlingly reli­able FreeBSD web server that just hap­pened to host a web­site for free for a long time.

There aren’t too many peo­ple you can make sit in the back of a car on their 18th birth­day, much less who will laugh along with as it happens.

This isn’t an obit­u­ary, just a poor expres­sion of remorse at the (human) dis­con­nec­tion and ‘drifted’ rela­tion­ships of that era. Michael, once all this stu­pid uni crap gets out of the way (maybe after you move again?), I owe you a fairly large drink.

Thankyou.

Firefox, straight to the front of the class

When­ever I need to find Fire­fox in task man­ager, it doesn’t ever take long. Fire­fox is the fat kid of web browsers… it’s kind of hard for it to hide. If it once were a sleek, lean fox, today it’s caught just a few too many stray chick­ens and drunk a lit­tle too much of Bean’s apple cider. It wouldn’t take any bull­doz­ers to find this fox, just a mod­er­ate sized key­board with three keys (no prizes for guess­ing the three-finger’d salute).

I haven’t had a great day with Fire­fox. Well… I spent 3 – 4 hours in meet­ings today, so I didn’t even have that much time with Fire­fox! Still man­aged to let me down twice, though.

Damn its indis­pos­able devel­op­ment tools *sobs uncontrollably*

I think I’ll switch back to Opera for all non-development Internet-related activ­ity for a while… unless any­one has any other browser rec­om­men­da­tions? I’ve seri­ously thought about IE7, but its ren­der­ing is still just a lit­tle too patchy for me to be able to live with myself as an Inter­net user.

Bleh. Let it be observed: even high-profile open source does not always lead to a good prod­uct. Its mem­ory man­age­ment is noth­ing short of repul­sive. It will reg­u­larly use more mem­ory than Pho­to­shop and Illus­tra­tor com­bined — admit­tedly, I use Pho­to­shop mostly for web pro­duc­tion and not high res­o­lu­tion print stuff (though that does hap­pen a few times a week, and it won’t often go far beyond the 350MB that Fire­fox seems to man­age fairly regularly)

I’m still using CS2, so there aren’t any mag­i­cal CS3 mem­ory man­age­ment advances that make such a claim pos­si­ble… Fire­fox just sucks :P

I’d blame Win­dows being in need of a rein­stall (it’s been run­ning since Octo­ber… more than six months with­out death :P Plus I started out not being happy with it because it’d been installed from the guy I bought the com­puter off, I just hacked it to use my CD key instead of the one he’d used to test things… so it’s never been per­fect), but really, it’s not that bad for any other appli­ca­tion. I nor­mally do a reboot once a week and things are fine… heavy duty graph­ics edit­ing, occa­sional video edit­ing, con­stant mail and occa­sional word­pro­cess­ing… and of all those things it is a web browser that can’t get it right. Per­haps I shouldn’t be so deri­sive about it see­ing as I make a liv­ing off devel­op­ing in this rel­a­tively sim­ple world… but I am.

The flip side to all of that, of course, is that I’ve been try­ing to live (more) like a nor­mal user the past few years. Essen­tially, recog­nis­ing that it’s sim­pler to buy soft­ware than write it (Word­Press, Flickr), using hackably-open tech­nolo­gies instead of truly open ones (WMA Loss­less sans DRM), and a gen­eral aban­don­ment of open source prin­ci­ples in favour of vastly improved pro­duc­tiv­ity (Pho­to­shop, Pre­miere, Office 2007, royalty-free stock).

It’s cer­tainly paid off in terms of pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment and enhanced cre­ative poten­tial… but there’s some­thing lost in not being able to hack visu­al­i­sa­tions hooked up to a web­cam together on a command-line any­more. Admit­tedly, that sort of thing only comes around half a dozen times a year! But no mat­ter, it’s all good fun. Given more friends who were into that sort of thing and some good music, I’d so live in the party house. I’ve not fig­ured out how to do the same command-line video tricks using Win­dows just yet, so next time I’ll prob­a­bly use Win­dows for visu­al­i­sa­tions (woo par­ti­cle emit­ters!) and a sep­a­rate Linux-powered lap­top (maybe?) for web­cam trick­ery. Then I’ll take web­cam stuff straight out into Win­dows cap­ture and skip my vis mixer alto­gether for once… I gotta learn to travel lighter anyway!

Nokia BH-501 and Windows XP Bluetooth A2DP playback

I had a sud­den com­pul­sion to make my BH-501 work at last with Win­dows after one too many late-night “I can’t use speak­ers and can no longer abide cables for crappy ear­phones” moments. If I had money enough to blow $200 on a decent set of head­phones expressly for the pur­pose of sit­ting at the PC late at night, sure, but I don’t at the minute. So my mobile’s Blue­tooth head­phones do a decent job in the time being.

The mag­i­cal secret, it seems, is Bluesoleil’s free EDR Blue­tooth man­ager soft­ware that allegedly has a 20MB data trans­fer lim­i­ta­tion per ses­sion until it’s pur­chased, but I’ve just down­loaded it and done over 50MB of audio data trans­fers in A2DP streams and it’s not com­plain­ing. Plus, Buy/Register under the Help menu are greyed out… so I don’t know quite how seri­ous they are about sell­ing this thing.

At any rate, it’s work­ing great for me, though my crappy Blue­tooth don­gle slows EVERYTHING about this com­puter down… must try another one, it’s not A2DP’s fault because when­ever I pair my mobile with it to sync the same thing hap­pens — even when nothing’s paired, as soon as you plug the don­gle in (USB) every­thing starts crawling.

All that said, BlueSoleil are great. Works well.