Chirography

It’s been seven months since my last exam. Seven months since using a pen was com­pul­sory. Tomor­row after­noon could be inter­est­ing… at least it should be rel­a­tively warm due to the time of day. I’ve stud­ied a lit­tle but not absurdly lots. Not too stressed, truth be told. Appar­ently arts degrees are a waste of time, any­way, so I have no rea­son to bother myself. I need to dis­ap­pear for a while and work a lot, but that would close so many doors and I just know I’d never come back (to most of them). That moves from the realm of “miss” into “lament”. I came across a won­der­ful word in the mar­gin­a­lia to a cer­tain poem of Eliot’s, wherein “high sen­tence” is explained as “sen­ten­tious­ness” (iron­i­cally, I had to find a def­i­n­i­tion for the expla­na­tion). The OED ren­ders it thus:

  1. Full of mean­ing; also, of per­sons, full of intel­li­gence or wis­dom. Obs.
  2. Of the nature of a ‘sen­tence’ or apho­ris­tic saying.
  3. Of dis­course, style, etc.: Abound­ing in pointed max­ims, apho­ris­tic. In recent use some­times in bad sense, affect­edly or pompously formal.
  4. Of per­sons: Given to the utter­ance of max­ims or pointed say­ings. Now often in bad sense, addicted to pompous moralizing.
  5. Of a sym­bol: Expres­sive of a whole sen­tence; opposed to ver­bal. Obs.
  6. Of com­po­si­tion: Con­sist­ing of detached sen­tences. Obs.

This word must get more of a work­out. But if I weren’t study­ing arts, obscu­ran­tic cant would be alto­gether frowned upon. I was read­ing someone’s blog the other day (in a fit of pro­cras­ti­na­tion, no doubt) who held Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises to be a com­plete waste of time on account of the mes­sage of the book boil­ing down to “Human­ity, you all suck and are pow­er­less, etc.”. The blog­ger in ques­tion held it to be utterly redun­dant on account of Hemingway’s fail­ure to offer a solu­tion. It begs the “so what” ques­tion in its fail­ure to pro­pose action. Per­haps said blog­ger would do well to be a lit­tle more exis­ten­tial­ist about lit­er­a­ture. Lit­er­a­ture serves as social enter­tain­ment at least as much as it serves as an avenue for prob­lem res­o­lu­tion. And, if it’s any con­so­la­tion to you, dear reader, if I were really feel­ing like a wanky arts stu­dent I would have made the word “prob­lema­tise” (or one of its deriv­a­tives) a part of the pre­vi­ous sen­tence. There is hope for me yet (if only in that I loathe that word with a pas­sion that escapes lan­guage itself, and along with that most who use it).

*tags under “long and wordy sen­tences”, as if there were ever a non-wordy sentence*

# by Josh Street on June 21st, 2007 | No Comments »

Too much nostalgia for a computer

What fol­lows is writ­ten far less well than it deserves, but — iron­i­cally — I’m drown­ing in other work at present. This needed writ­ing sooner than other things did.

Michael’s pulling the plug on the server that this web­site has run on since 2003.

The ‘server’ has changed dra­mat­i­cally in con­sti­tu­tion since it all began way back when, but… wow. An aston­ish­ingly large part of my teenage years. For the longest time, it seemed as though the Inter­net had alto­gether ceased to exist every­time Dale’s con­nec­tion went out. In the early days, we were all run­ning servers on port 1200 to cir­cum­vent ISP restric­tions on port 80. phpBB was the order of the day, run­ning Apache — on a pirated copy of Win­dows 2000 (those were the days in which “legit­mate soft­ware” con­sti­tuted an oxy­moron). Oper­at­ing on an early ADSL link with 64kbps upload, forum emoti­cons were hosted on free web space pro­vided by iiNet in order to con­serve band­width. You laugh now, but the speed boost was incred­i­ble. Every time iiNet dropped out (to future read­ers: that’s what hap­pens when the inter­net goes out for a cou­ple of hours, none of this occa­sional con­nec­tion time-out rub­bish), an irate explana­tory post from mwd­meyer would emerge and life would con­tinue as nor­mal. Until par­ents dis­cov­ered the server run­ning and turned it off again, which would spark an effort to con­ceal yet another com­puter in a room crowded full of equip­ment. About halfway through 2004, they gave up searching.

These were the days (for me) of NE2000 clones pow­er­ing Smoothwall/m0n0wall routers, recy­cling hard­ware, a sub­scrip­tion to Atomic before all the other kids (I bought more geeky mag­a­zines than any­one I know – I think it was that strange meet­ing place of compters, cre­ativ­ity, and cant that I later became com­fort­able with), when GeForce 2’s and Pen­tium 4’s (the first ones with RDRAM that every­one despised) and DDR-supporting Athlons were still zippy. When frame-based redi­rects passed for domain names — .tk, anyone?

Mostly, it was about the forums… but as for per­sonal pub­lish­ing, this was no small resource. My first dynamic web­site was a blog hosted on that server — I don’t think it yet had a name — we all rolled our own web soft­ware in those days (it’s not that long ago). Some of us still do. The first domain name acquired was Dale’s, in March 2004, co-inciding (more or less) with the forums’ first birth­day. Twelve US dol­lars later (Joker.com’s prices still haven’t changed), we were all still using frame-based redi­rects — sta­tic IPs were the stuff of pipe-dreams, and Dynamic DNS, though around, was out­side of the expe­ri­ence of most of us. Steve ran a notoriously-flaky IIS server with real domains and Exchange, but paid about $150 a month for the priv­i­lege: sta­tic IPs being avail­able only on busi­ness grade inter­net connections.

These are mere details. The forums them­selves con­sti­tute an amaz­ing chron­i­cle of the lives of mwd­meyer, ucosty, Sammy, i_am_a_n00bie, Smile:), smKz, n|cktangents, angelicde­ity, baibai, Sphinx^, lud­vikas, and a hand­ful of oth­ers over a fairly tumul­tuous time. There is so much not recorded explic­itly that sur­rounds the nearly 16,000 mes­sages from these eleven users alone. Some has been sup­pressed, other parts for­got­ten, but all of it inex­tri­ca­bly linked together in the momen­tum of time. There are some things about that time which will never be shared with those who weren’t around.

The forums didn’t sur­vive post-school. This shouldn’t be sur­pris­ing, given the amount of research that says this will be the case for any given rela­tion­ships faced with that man­ner of tran­si­tion, but it was still bizarre wit­ness­ing what would have been sev­eral months of time spent on a sin­gle web­site evap­o­rate into (not much). The server moved from Bal­main to Mar­ian Street, even­tu­ally find­ing its way into a rack there. This is where things get hazy for me. I think the last time I saw Michael might’ve been New Years’ Eve 2005/2006… I feel some sense of guilt about that, but recog­nise mutual busy-ness had a role such that nei­ther of us should be blamed alone. I don’t believe that a blame­less “but things changed” is ever suf­fi­cient when talk­ing about close rela­tion­ships. I’m fairly cer­tain my clos­est friend for about two years at school is some­one that I no longer have any­thing to do with, but can’t explain why. And I know that I can’t in any way blame him, because I’m so guilty of fail­ing to keep work­ing on rela­tion­ships myself.

I sup­pose the point of all this is that the com­puter for­mally known as ‘Metro’, now ‘Loki’ (I don’t know how it got that name — Loki to me is an amaz­ing con­trib­u­tor to Linux-based gam­ing, 2000 – 2002 RIP, but it could just as eas­ily have been named after the Norse trick­ster and Odin’s wily accom­plice!) isn’t just the lat­est in a series of bits of elec­tronic gear that some markup and pix­els have been piped off for a cou­ple of years. This is just one step closer to a com­plete clo­sure of a very large chap­ter of my life… and, yeah, that’s incred­i­bly sad.

Please don’t for a minute con­sider this to be my argu­ing that Loki should stay switched on — it’s about some­thing far greater and more per­sonal than a star­tlingly reli­able FreeBSD web server that just hap­pened to host a web­site for free for a long time.

There aren’t too many peo­ple you can make sit in the back of a car on their 18th birth­day, much less who will laugh along with as it happens.

This isn’t an obit­u­ary, just a poor expres­sion of remorse at the (human) dis­con­nec­tion and ‘drifted’ rela­tion­ships of that era. Michael, once all this stu­pid uni crap gets out of the way (maybe after you move again?), I owe you a fairly large drink.

Thankyou.

The Arden Shakespeare series, the next month, CYIADA update

Offi­cially what I’ll be try­ing to acquire when I buy Shake­speare from now on. I have their The Winter’s Tale title, and it is noth­ing less than spec­tac­u­lar. It even includes as an Appen­dix the com­plete text of Pan­dosto. The Tri­umph of Time. (the pri­mary source text for Shakespeare’s play). Pages 181 – 225 are devoted to this text alone… very cool. I do won­der if they do the same with texts such as Ros­alynde as appro­pri­ate, or if this par­tic­u­lar edition’s edi­tor was feel­ing par­tic­u­larly benevolent!

Either way… highly rec­om­mended editions.

Also to acquire when next book shop­ping: Alice in Won­der­land, for some opium-fuelled hol­i­day read­ing. And per­haps Hitchhiker’s Guide to see if I can endure it nine years from when I last tried… less likely fuelled by opium, but from all reports it sounds bizarre enough to war­rant sus­pi­cion of the involve­ment of some other mind-altering substances!

Hol­i­day read­ing = after June 22nd, where­upon my last exam occurs. Then, off to lead on a study camp (per­haps time for read­ing? I can jus­tify Alice as being in sup­port of the HSC Eng­lish ‘jour­neys’ core!) for a week, three days back home in Syd­ney (undoubt­edly to be insanely busy) before going away to New Zealand from the 4th to 16th of July. My how time flies. I may or may not be at uni­ver­sity in an equal capac­ity next semes­ter due to a whole bunch of things, pri­mar­ily related to its per­ceived impor­tance and myr­iad other oppor­tu­ni­ties that are crop­ping up all over the place. It would be, for exam­ple, nice to have some money in exchange for funny hours in the form of more work (which I think I pre­fer to reg­u­lar and bor­ing hours) and not have to pur­sue use­less assess­ments (I speak of one par­tic­u­lar sub­ject that has copped flak on this blog over the past few months) around this.

The CYIADA thing is pro­gress­ing nicely. Michael came on board about a month ago as chief code mon­key, which has been nice coz I’ve been spend­ing a bit more guilt-free time in Pho­to­shop. There is a two-fold rea­son for that, first of which being I don’t feel like I need to try and pro­to­type any­thing on my own, and the other is that now he’s devel­op­ing stuff, there’s an immi­nent need for front-end to make this thing saleable! We’re close to land­ing on a new name that doesn’t sound like some­thing you’d use to gas peo­ple with.

There’s a meet­ing tomor­row arvo wherein we will speak of many things (except per­haps for shoes and ships and ceil­ing wax and cab­bages and kings), involv­ing a progress update, an exten­sive argu­ment about names and inclu­sive­ness, prayer, another argu­ment about launch dates and where/how it’s going to be hosted, who’s pro­vid­ing SMS, how much money we’re plan­ning on los­ing and for how long, how we’re going to pro­mote it, open sourc­ing things we write, and lots lots more.

I should really update the CYIADA project blog, too, but we haven’t got stag­ger­ingly good read­er­ship over there any­way (well, not com­pared to here, though per­haps more after South­ern Cross’ cov­er­age — at the end of that arti­cle, which is effec­tively buried online, though less so in print… iron­i­cally we need online read­ers far more than print ones!) so hope­fully that will wait until we set­tle on a new name (and asso­ci­ated domain name acqui­si­tions take place).

Oh and in unre­lated news, my cam­era turned up. It wasn’t in Selo’s car. This is a good and a bad thing… good because I have no money to spend on a still cam­era right now, bad because I have no rea­son to buy a new one even if I did :P It’s still got another six months of life left in it I think, though it’s look­ing pretty abused. Still takes decent pic­tures. I’m so happy with its per­for­mance over the last two and a half years (link goes to first pho­tos I took with it), seri­ously. I will strug­gle to make up my mind when it dies about what kind of cam­era to get… a larger SLR would be more use­ful for pro­duc­tion stuff and night time things, but this is so portable… I don’t know.

And there is a decent sized blog update.

Now, I should stop pro­cras­ti­nat­ing and pre­pare to kick off some fairly press­ing free­lance work when I get back from uni tonight! Uni assess­ments, also, are prov­ing to be rather wor­thy of pro­cras­ti­na­tion. Ahhhh… I keep remem­ber­ing “one more thing” to write about: 28 Weeks Later proved to be a seri­ously scary zom­bie flick. Saw it with Ben and Tori last night. Was ulti­mate year 10 flash­backs, only with added alco­hol and late nights with­out con­cerned parentals! We went to Pizza Hut all you can eat after­wards… its so dis­gust­ing but such good fun :P

As for the movie… it’s quite messy. But it was spec­tac­u­larly pro­duced… I need to re-watch the first one, but I’m pretty sure it was much more in-your-face sus­pense­ful. It sets up for a third film at the end, which vaguely irri­tates me, but… well, rumours have it that it’ll be capped at a tril­ogy only. And this was a really good sequel, so I don’t think it’ll mat­ter too much. Wikipedia has full spoiler detail for 28 Weeks Later… See the film first instead if you can nor­mally han­dle that sort of thing.

# by Josh Street on May 24th, 2007 Tags: , , , , , ,
| 2 Comments »

Ess-aye?

# by Josh Street on May 2nd, 2007 | No Comments »

ARIN2620 — Cyberworlds — A waste of time

If you a mod­er­ate degree of IT pro­fi­ciency, this course will be wast­ing your time. On Wednes­day I get to attend a one hour tuto­r­ial on how to use a library data­base. Fur­ther, our delight­ful course co-ordinator had the audac­ity to pre­tend that the tuto­r­ial “is vital, not only for your team, but for your indi­vid­ual assessment”.

Way to insult the col­lec­tive intel­li­gence of the course’s par­tic­i­pants. Not that I have a par­tic­u­larly high regard for the required stan­dard of intel­li­gence to par­tic­i­pate in said course. Hint: if you want a uni degree with very lit­tle effort, do a Dig­i­tal Cul­tures major. The only prob­lem will be try­ing not to shud­der every time you see your­self in the mir­ror, because you will have buzz­words swarm­ing around you with­out end. Oh, yeah, and you have to live with the knowl­edge that your study is of absolutely per­sonal or (espe­cially) pro­fes­sional value what­so­ever, unless of course you like the poi­son so much you go back and start teach­ing it.

Yes, some hyper­bole might have been tossed about in the mak­ing of this blog post. It’s still a bloody use­less course (and, from what I can gather, major pro­gramme) that’s par­tic­u­larly good at insult­ing its par­tic­i­pants’ intelligence.

Our uni­ver­sity has a Learn­ing Cen­tre for those who strug­gle using basic ICT resources. I’m try­ing not to be too demean­ing about it, but, in all seri­ous­ness, who would sign up for a course about the freakin’ Inter­net with­out know­ing how to use a bloody library data­base? They taught those skills to kids when I was in pri­mary school. Yes, that’s 1990’s.

I so can’t wait to give course feed­back on this already.

# by Josh Street on March 26th, 2007 Tags:
| 1 Comment »

Abuse of language; or, what is a lecture?

I have a clash in my uni timetable. That’s okay. But it would aid my deci­sion mak­ing process in what sub­ject I am plan­ning to avoid immensely if bloody aca­d­e­mics under­stood the mean­ings of words they encounter and use daily.

Accord­ing to the OED:

lec­ture, n.
4. a. A dis­course given before an audi­ence upon a given sub­ject, usu­ally for the pur­pose of instruction.

How then, I ask, is it accept­able to label a given teach­ing time an “inter­ac­tive lec­ture” wherein the prin­ci­pal activ­ity con­sti­tutes what would, in com­mon par­lance, be termed “group work”? Call if a sym­po­sium or some­thing else equally wanky and pre­ten­tious if you can’t bring your­selves to call a spade a spade and per­haps sim­ply call it a sem­i­nar, but for good­ness sake — avoid bas­tar­dis­ing terms where the nature of their deliv­ery and method is clearly under­stood to be some­thing else entirely!

This is not the fault of the Eng­lish depart­ment, by the way. The sub­ject in ques­tion is run by the fartily named “Dig­i­tal Cul­tures” school. I do not esteem them very highly thus far… the sub­ject seems like a bit of a waste of time, but hope­fully it’ll be good for net­work­ing with a hand­ful of other peo­ple in the course who also feel they’re hav­ing their time wasted, and then we can sub­vert the depart­ment from within by allow­ing actual web prac­tice to influ­ence these (prob­a­bly self-proclaimed futur­ist) lec­tur­ers in courses they don’t really understand.

I paid $17 for a pho­to­copied course reader full of arti­cles from before Bub­ble 1.0 burst. Rec­om­mended read­ing for “Web 2.0″ (yes, they dared use that word) con­sists of Wikipedia and arti­cles in Time mag­a­zine. Yes, I feel as vio­lated as you do. This seems like an area of ter­tiary edu­ca­tion that is par­tic­u­larly lost in its own mud­dled up lan­guage and self-congratulatory con­fer­ences and pub­li­ca­tions that it has not the fog­gi­est idea what real peo­ple are doing with the web. Or, alter­na­tively, if that’s not the case, there seems to be an awful lot of catch-up work required on the ped­a­gogy front: the reader facil­i­tates some kind of pseudo-sociological explo­ration of ‘the web’ as an entity, but some­how man­ages to seem com­pletely irrel­e­vant to actual practice.

What on earth is a Dig­i­tal Cul­tures major equip­ping peo­ple for? Not engage­ment with online media! An abil­ity to dis­cern a qual­ity Wikipedia arti­cle, and a cul­ti­vated taste for arti­cles in Time, and, per­haps, at best, an abil­ity to read par­tic­u­larly head-up-ass style jour­nals address­ing issues that are so bound up in recent anachro­nism that it can’t even be deemed an his­tor­i­cally valu­able specialisation?

Okay I’m [nearly] done. I’m going to stick around in the course because stu­dents were hav­ing some really inter­est­ing dis­cus­sions fairly inde­pen­dently of the lecturer’s [sic] direc­tion today, and because there are some peo­ple that sound like they have some idea what they’re talk­ing about. Of course, there’s always one mature age male try­ing to con­vince peo­ple to join him in devel­op­ing some web 2.0 social net­work­ing busi­ness case, but one in a course of sixty isn’t too bad. Grum­ble grum­ble. He’s prob­a­bly back at uni after hav­ing sent some poor busi­ness bankrupt.

I can see this hav­ing the poten­tial to be like a real-world overly-opinionated dis­cus­sion forum, but that’ll prob­a­bly be fun for a semes­ter. My opin­ions reserve the right to change dra­mat­i­cally over the com­ing weeks — I write this from only two hours of read­ing and an hour of “lecture”.

Really, I feel bet­ter now :)

Sign of a desparate history faculty?

Not enough peo­ple enrolling in hon­ours? How about send­ing a let­ter (yes, paper let­ter) to every sin­gle 1st year stu­dent who achieves a credit or above (after all, that’s all you need for hon­ours) ask­ing them if they would be inter­ested? Because, you know, credit-average stu­dents are all bril­liant and pas­sion­ate enough to bother stick­ing around at uni that extra year.

It’s flat­ter­ing and all, but a lit­tle mis­placed methinks. Now all I have to do is bicker with them until I’m allowed to do second-year his­tory on account of per­plex­ing pre­req­ui­sites. Which involves get­ting in touch. Which involves kid­nap­ping some­one, I think, because leav­ing a mes­sage just doesn’t seem to be too effec­tive in that place.

Please excuse my pent up sar­casm. This is pre-holiday trauma brought on by pack­ing whilst try­ing not to get too frus­trated at overly pan­icked fam­ily mem­bers and get­ting on top of free­lance work whilst wait­ing for some mod­er­ately impor­tant details that were meant to arrive at “close of busi­ness” (quote) today. It’s now 5.05pm. I’d nor­mally say it was just some­one else’s prob­lem (I’m only gone ten days), but this is my baby we’re talk­ing about, so it’s not quite that easy.

The joys of work­ing for a startup, hey? Only it’s a well-funded startup shar­ing premises with not-really-a-startup-at-all. So maybe I will be able to poach staff from other star­tups… one par­tic­u­lar indi­vid­ual came to my atten­tion at a meet­ing last night & rest assured I will be work­ing hard to con­vince him that he wants to quit his job ;-) Pumba was sit­ting a few seats away when we started talk­ing and dis­ap­peared to get a drink. He burst out laugh­ing on his return because of the speed with which I’d man­aged to launch into my project spiel to this par­tic­u­lar indi­vid­ual… I felt kinda bad at the time but now just find it amus­ing :P

Any­way. I leave tomor­row and will hope­fully get so much more read­ing done than in the last eight months at uni. And maybe skin cancer.

# by Josh Street on December 12th, 2006 Tags:
| 3 Comments »