The Arden Shakespeare series, the next month, CYIADA update

Offi­cially what I’ll be try­ing to acquire when I buy Shake­speare from now on. I have their The Winter’s Tale title, and it is noth­ing less than spec­tac­u­lar. It even includes as an Appen­dix the com­plete text of Pan­dosto. The Tri­umph of Time. (the pri­mary source text for Shakespeare’s play). Pages 181 – 225 are devoted to this text alone… very cool. I do won­der if they do the same with texts such as Ros­alynde as appro­pri­ate, or if this par­tic­u­lar edition’s edi­tor was feel­ing par­tic­u­larly benevolent!

Either way… highly rec­om­mended editions.

Also to acquire when next book shop­ping: Alice in Won­der­land, for some opium-fuelled hol­i­day read­ing. And per­haps Hitchhiker’s Guide to see if I can endure it nine years from when I last tried… less likely fuelled by opium, but from all reports it sounds bizarre enough to war­rant sus­pi­cion of the involve­ment of some other mind-altering substances!

Hol­i­day read­ing = after June 22nd, where­upon my last exam occurs. Then, off to lead on a study camp (per­haps time for read­ing? I can jus­tify Alice as being in sup­port of the HSC Eng­lish ‘jour­neys’ core!) for a week, three days back home in Syd­ney (undoubt­edly to be insanely busy) before going away to New Zealand from the 4th to 16th of July. My how time flies. I may or may not be at uni­ver­sity in an equal capac­ity next semes­ter due to a whole bunch of things, pri­mar­ily related to its per­ceived impor­tance and myr­iad other oppor­tu­ni­ties that are crop­ping up all over the place. It would be, for exam­ple, nice to have some money in exchange for funny hours in the form of more work (which I think I pre­fer to reg­u­lar and bor­ing hours) and not have to pur­sue use­less assess­ments (I speak of one par­tic­u­lar sub­ject that has copped flak on this blog over the past few months) around this.

The CYIADA thing is pro­gress­ing nicely. Michael came on board about a month ago as chief code mon­key, which has been nice coz I’ve been spend­ing a bit more guilt-free time in Pho­to­shop. There is a two-fold rea­son for that, first of which being I don’t feel like I need to try and pro­to­type any­thing on my own, and the other is that now he’s devel­op­ing stuff, there’s an immi­nent need for front-end to make this thing saleable! We’re close to land­ing on a new name that doesn’t sound like some­thing you’d use to gas peo­ple with.

There’s a meet­ing tomor­row arvo wherein we will speak of many things (except per­haps for shoes and ships and ceil­ing wax and cab­bages and kings), involv­ing a progress update, an exten­sive argu­ment about names and inclu­sive­ness, prayer, another argu­ment about launch dates and where/how it’s going to be hosted, who’s pro­vid­ing SMS, how much money we’re plan­ning on los­ing and for how long, how we’re going to pro­mote it, open sourc­ing things we write, and lots lots more.

I should really update the CYIADA project blog, too, but we haven’t got stag­ger­ingly good read­er­ship over there any­way (well, not com­pared to here, though per­haps more after South­ern Cross’ cov­er­age — at the end of that arti­cle, which is effec­tively buried online, though less so in print… iron­i­cally we need online read­ers far more than print ones!) so hope­fully that will wait until we set­tle on a new name (and asso­ci­ated domain name acqui­si­tions take place).

Oh and in unre­lated news, my cam­era turned up. It wasn’t in Selo’s car. This is a good and a bad thing… good because I have no money to spend on a still cam­era right now, bad because I have no rea­son to buy a new one even if I did :P It’s still got another six months of life left in it I think, though it’s look­ing pretty abused. Still takes decent pic­tures. I’m so happy with its per­for­mance over the last two and a half years (link goes to first pho­tos I took with it), seri­ously. I will strug­gle to make up my mind when it dies about what kind of cam­era to get… a larger SLR would be more use­ful for pro­duc­tion stuff and night time things, but this is so portable… I don’t know.

And there is a decent sized blog update.

Now, I should stop pro­cras­ti­nat­ing and pre­pare to kick off some fairly press­ing free­lance work when I get back from uni tonight! Uni assess­ments, also, are prov­ing to be rather wor­thy of pro­cras­ti­na­tion. Ahhhh… I keep remem­ber­ing “one more thing” to write about: 28 Weeks Later proved to be a seri­ously scary zom­bie flick. Saw it with Ben and Tori last night. Was ulti­mate year 10 flash­backs, only with added alco­hol and late nights with­out con­cerned parentals! We went to Pizza Hut all you can eat after­wards… its so dis­gust­ing but such good fun :P

As for the movie… it’s quite messy. But it was spec­tac­u­larly pro­duced… I need to re-watch the first one, but I’m pretty sure it was much more in-your-face sus­pense­ful. It sets up for a third film at the end, which vaguely irri­tates me, but… well, rumours have it that it’ll be capped at a tril­ogy only. And this was a really good sequel, so I don’t think it’ll mat­ter too much. Wikipedia has full spoiler detail for 28 Weeks Later… See the film first instead if you can nor­mally han­dle that sort of thing.

# by Josh on May 24th, 2007 Tags: , , , , , ,
| 2 Comments »

SACS Idol 2005 revisited

It was good. Better-than-last-year good, but that was sort of antic­i­pated. There were 19 per­form­ers all up, rang­ing from skits to musi­cal per­for­mances to stand-up com­edy to political-campaign style baby wielding.

Photo of a performance

The vot­ing was a suc­cess, with about 160 peo­ple throw­ing in their voice — but pri­mar­ily just via stan­dard vot­ing ter­mi­nals, with SMS vot­ing not being heav­ily used. I don’t think it was the result of people’s hes­i­tance to use SMS, but rather incor­rect pro­mo­tion — the pro­gramme should have fea­tured SMS codes for all acts, as well as instruc­tions on how to vote on the back cover. We were going to do a brief “how to vote” video, but ran out of time to cut it together, which also didn’t help things.

The tick­et­ing sys­tem was also par­tially to blame — there were two types of ticket; stan­dard vot­ing tokens (for use at the ter­mi­nals) and SMS tick­ets, which fea­tured a unique code. More than a few audi­ence mem­bers were look­ing for the non-existant SMS code on their ticket — more sig­nage out­side was required, and I didn’t get a chance to talk to the ticket sell­ers, so it’s pos­si­ble they weren’t ask­ing peo­ple how they’d like to vote.

Any­way, SMS vot­ing was barely used, but needed a query that was stu­pidly com­pli­cated to fig­ure out who voted for what (at least com­pared to last year’s sys­tem). I hadn’t thought about how the votes would be returned that hard, think­ing I’d be able to quickly cook up some SQL to do it, as per last year… so at about 4pm (FOH opened at 6:30pm) I realised that it was a lit­tle more com­pli­cated than antic­i­pated, and I made a slightly-anxious phone call to Michael, who man­aged to cook up the fol­low­ing over the phone.

SELECT participants.name, count( votes.For_ID ) AS count
FROM participants
LEFT JOIN votes ON participants.ID = votes.For_ID
GROUP BY participants.ID
ORDER BY `count` DESC

Dale, you’re a freak, but thankyou!

Learn­ing how to use LEFT JOIN is now high on my to-learn list.

Any­way, the results them­selves were won­der­fully con­tro­ver­sial — the win­ner was The Aaron Carter Trib­ute Band, of Year 11, which was in direct com­pe­ti­tion with The Back­street Toys of Year 12 all night — and Back­street Toys came in sec­ond place with just one vote between them!

Third place was Jack Wright, who was a mere three votes from the win­ner — and all three were leap frog­ging each other for the dura­tion of the vot­ing period. Excit­ing stuff to watch!

SACS Idol results chart

Thanks to all who went on the night, you helped raise over $700 for Assis­tance Dogs, and hope­fully had a lot of fun in doing so! Spe­cial thanks also to Ben for his abil­ity to keep dri­ving in the small hours of the morn­ing, to Steve and Guy for com­ing back and cook­ing up vision, and to Digi­hire for reduced-rate hire of a MX-50 vision mixer!

Vision and voting control desk
Two guitarists/singers onstage

# by Josh on May 14th, 2005 Tags: , , , , , ,
| 7 Comments »

A picnic.

The sub­ject of this post­ing occurred today with Sam, Katy (whom I had not seen for faaaar too long!), Ben and Sam’s dog, Tuffy (he has his own email address and web­site!) in a park in some part of Syd­ney kind of near the Anzac Bridge, at which lots of pho­tos were taken. And at which I was given a white­board (!!) as a late-Christmas/early-Birthday present! Wowowowowow! So we had some fun with that thing, too. In a park, no less.

In an attempt to redeem myself in the eyes of my overly neglected Pho­to­Stack instal­la­tion (it’s only because I haven’t got a scan­ner at the minute, I promise! I’ve got four rolls of film to scan as soon as I move into per­ma­nent acco­mo­da­tion again and get the HP thing back!), I’m not going to post all the images on the front page (good­ness, it might even save some bandwidth!) — if you wish to peruse the whole lot, the whole album is online.

My favorites:

Never trust a man who, left alone with a tea cosy, does not try it on his head.  Penned on a whiteboard, complete with lame half illustration - mine.

Sam and Ben hold their baby... err... Tuffy.  Cute photo!

Sam and Tuffy poking out tounges.

Mother Katy holds Tuffy.

As always, if you can be both­ered, my com­ments reside in the ALT text for all images in the gallery (some are more exten­sive than oth­ers), which can be seen (gen­er­ally) by hold­ing your mouse over the rel­e­vant thumbnail/image. This may not work in Inter­net Explorer, sorry folks. Get Fire­fox if you want a web browser that’s faster, more secure, and gen­er­ally does stuff well!

If any­one feels my alter­nate tex­tual expla­na­tions of the images are insuf­fi­cient (e.g. require con­tex­tual knowl­edge of a visual nature in order to under­stand com­ments made, etc.), please feel free to let me know and I’ll do some­thing about it. The con­tact form is the best way to get in touch.

Pirates, and other movie-related things

Whilst this SMH arti­cle is dis­cussing some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent, I was inter­ested (per­haps sad­dened?) to learn that there is a sequel to Pirates of the Caribbean in the works. That sucks! Read the rest of this entry »

Crazy trance music!

Phwoar.  I just heard the most insane mix of Evanescence’s Hello on DI.fm Vocal Trance.  The song in itself is pretty haunt­ing, so it did lend itself to a genre which is tra­di­tion­ally heavy on high reverb times, but I was more impressed by the fact that it didn’t just SUCK.  Look at the atroc­ity which is the Radio Edit of My Immor­tal! I paid for their album, Fallen, which appar­ently enti­tles me to a free down­load of the “Band Ver­sion” (as they insist on call­ing it… I’d go for “Mass-Audiences-are-Stupid™ ver­sion”, instead — but then, I prob­a­bly don’t work in mar­ket­ing for a rea­son), which I have declined.

I’m still not over how much the radio edit of that track sucked. Bleh! Any­way. The vocal trance ver­sion of Hello was seri­ously sweet, espe­cially after you con­sider it wasn’t done in-house — that is, with­out access to orig­i­nal tracks and other such use­ful things. So yeah. That’s my ran­dom­ness for the day over ;)

What else? Oh. Saw Dawn of the Dead last night with Ben and Tori — it was kind of like 28 Days Later, only prob­a­bly pro­duced on a much higher bud­get (28 Days Later was a film grant pro­duc­tion, but it didn’t really show, aside from the fact that it was shot on dig­i­tal rather than telecine — even then, they claim it was a delib­er­ate styl­is­tic deci­sion rather than the result of any bud­get con­straints). Oh, and it was more gory and less sus­pense­ful (if that is a word — if not, it is now) than 28 Days Later… that said, it was hilar­i­ous at times, although whether this is an inher­ent attribute of the film itself, or sim­ply a by-product of the audi­ence and com­pany I saw it in is some­thing which I’ll leave for some­one else to decide!

# by Josh on July 1st, 2004 Tags: , , , ,
| No Comments »