Outlook 2007 sucks

Bor­ing post sub­ject, I know. But check this out:

Outlook is preparing the requested view

Took around a full minute for the folder to load, on an Athlon 64 3200+ clocked at 2.4GHz with 2GB of fairly quick memory.

Since when do apps alert in the tray about load­ing a view? If Out­look didn’t expend resources on a generally-useless tray icon (really, it doesn’t even change when you have new mail wait­ing), maybe it wouldn’t take so bloody long to do anything.

I’ve got a dual core 4200+ on the way, but really doubt it’ll make any dif­fer­ence when the fault is largely soft­ware that sucks. Not say­ing that it’s just Out­look at fault… I’m inclined to place a fair degree of blame on the well-known-to-be-sucky Win­dows Desk­top Search. But it just inte­grates best… why does Microsoft have to pro­duce prod­ucts that suck?!

Speak­ing of which, my iPaq is work­ing again with a brand new extended bat­tery. Apart from the slow proces­sor, it’s doing great… but I’m going to test-drive a Palm Z72 for a few days and see if it does any bet­ter. Basi­cally, I don’t really need the GSM/GPRS func­tion­al­ity on the iPaq because it’s faster for me to con­nect via my Sony Eric­s­son via Blue­tooth (as there’s no HSDPA on the iPaq). I’ll imme­di­ately miss the wire­less, but have sur­vived sev­eral months with­out it, and SDiO wifi cards are a pos­si­bil­ity for the palm… I doubt they’re par­tic­u­larly com­mon, though. Have been con­sid­er­ing a Black­berry, but they’re pretty restricted in a whole heap of ways that PDAs aren’t. For exam­ple, ever tried get­ting an SSH client on a Black­berry? I haven’t. But have my doubts it could be done!

Any­way. Don’t use Out­look 2007 unless you have to.  It has nice multi-calendar/iCal sup­port, but that’s about all it has going for it. Still no inbuilt SMS/MMS sup­port, the ren­derer is a regres­sion in the truest sense of the term (doesn’t even sup­port back­ground images — IE7 comes out, which is an awe­some browser, and they decide it would be a good idea to force Word 2007 to be the ren­derer. Bril­liant.), thor­oughly mediocre RSS/feed-reading capa­bil­i­ties, and, to top it all off, it’s crap-slow (com­pared to ear­lier versions).

If it offers group­ware advan­tages I don’t know of them (but doubt it could, it’s always been fairly com­pre­hen­sive on that front), and chances are they won’t be par­tic­u­larly enabled until Server 2008 is released. Am guess­ing here, but not with­out some reasoning.

Avoid.

p.s. Yes, I’m prob­a­bly over­due for a Win­dows rein­stall.  Unfor­tu­nately a fairly major project cropped up just as I’d sched­uled one, and I still haven’t got around to it. Will prob­a­bly hunt down the right prod­uct key when the new CPU gets here early next week: that’s a large part of the prob­lem, Microsoft appar­ently expect that home users either buy pre­built sys­tems with stu­pid crapware-filled restore disks, or are hard­core tech using pirates/MSDN users (same thing… the users rarely paid for the MSDN subs, mostly its their work­place). I have 5 XP Pro licenses of dif­fer­ent vari­eties (not to men­tion pre­vi­ous ver­sions of Win­dows), and of those a bunch are the same prod­uct type (upgrade)… which makes license man­age­ment and com­pli­ance a bit of a challenge!

What I’d love MS to do is cre­ate a site-licensing prod­uct for SOHO users with flex­i­ble and trans­fer­able licens­ing at retail OEM pric­ing (that sounds dumb, but I mean still charg­ing what us mor­tals pay for OEM licenses, not the vol­ume prices that Dell, Lenovo, et al. get) — it’d be sim­ple, web admin­is­tered (not requir­ing a local server), and increas­ingly rel­e­vant in homes which are fea­tur­ing more and more computers.

JABOB

Did some party light­ing for Ellen’s 18th last Thurs­day night. Just a bunch of bal­loons… with a twist. (Click for enlarged)

Balloons with LED illumination

Yes, the twist is that they glow. Good times.

Not quite bright enough to pro­vide use­ful illu­mi­na­tion, but enough to be intrin­si­cally inter­est­ing & entertaining.

I was con­cerned about bat­tery life hold­ing out: I should have been con­cerned about get­ting larger-capacity bal­loons in order to achieve the buoy­ancy required. The bal­loons we had (all 11″ metal­lic) all flew ini­tially, when inflated to absolute-max capac­ity, but most of them were down within 5 hours. 14″ bal­loons prob­a­bly would’ve per­formed a lot bet­ter, but we’ll never know.

We also pol­ished off a CL tank (rated for 50 bal­loons) about two bal­loons from the end of the lot, so big­ger cir­cum­fer­ence would obvi­ously require a D tank.

Future enhance­ments: size, obvi­ously; dif­fer­ent LED hous­ing for wider light; magnetic/RFID switch­ing on LEDs (we were flick­ing them on at inflate time); and increased bright­ness to make them more effec­tive as light­ing, not just entertainment.

The direc­tion I’d ulti­mately like to take it is non-latex/heavy-duty inflat­a­bles with per­ma­nently installed LEDs + wire­less con­troller. At present it’s a tri-colour LED that auto­mat­i­cally cycles between the three sub-diodes (I sup­pose they’re three real diodes, but what­ever) that are RGB. I’d like to sep­a­rate that out into three 10k MCD diodes (for a peak 30k MCD out­put at ‘white’) and a recharge­able sup­ply… not quite sure what the best way to do that is. The inflat­able would prob­a­bly be about 15” with the lumi­naire (ide­ally) sus­pended in its cen­tre so it could be used as a non-lighter-than-air device and main­tain its effec­tive­ness as a light. Think really big beach balls.

I’m look­ing at get­ting a pre­fab Blue­tooth thing with an onboard micro­con­troller to man­age it… would also like to add a micro­phone in to make it audio-responsive with­out wire­less inter­ven­tion (because wire­less will suck lots more power, amongst other things). Blue­tooth would be utilised pri­mar­ily for fad­ing the fix­tures in and out rather than colour con­trol, though obvi­ously once one is in place it’s only a small step to intro­duce dis­creet faders for each colour channel.

All that said, I know noth­ing much about Blue­tooth. I’m look­ing at a Class 1 pre­fab board with a micro­con­troller which looks good, but is rather unchar­i­ta­bly priced at 79€ per unit, and the only pub­lished unit dis­count step is a measly 2€ at 10 units. That’d make the cost of these lit­tle mon­sters (con­troller, LEDs, power, what­ever funky kind of con­tainer I find for all of the things) at least AU$250/fixture after fund­ing devel­op­ment, which does seem like an awful lot! But if they’re recharge­able and can fly and stuff I think there’s a pos­si­bil­ity other peo­ple would buy them. On Thurs­day night a lot of peo­ple were pretty fas­ci­nated by them, even when they ended up on the floor.

Methinks I’ll try and build a cou­ple for myself before even think­ing about sell­ing them, and if that comes close to hap­pen­ing look at other wire­less options. I’m pic­tur­ing some­thing cool like walk­ing around a room with 100 of these things flown on the ceil­ing (either teth­ered together or helium filled) hold­ing a Bluetooth-capable PDA, the lights fol­low­ing you posi­tion. Processor-intensive signal-strength cal­cu­la­tions would be done on the PDA itself, which would arrange the sig­nals in a matrix and detect the near­est neigh­bour, set­ting its inten­sity (and the inten­sity of the sur­round­ing sig­nals) accord­ingly. There are other options, per­haps involv­ing W-DMX512, but that’d require a sep­a­rate micro­con­troller methinks.

Fun­nily enough, when look­ing through the wire­less DMX cat­a­logue for this year, it turns out the LD for Cirque du Soleil Delir­ium did basi­cally the exact same thing (Wire­less DMX + colour mix­ing RGB LEDs + 15” bal­loon)! Page 20 has an OEM TRX mod­ule in a 84x48mm form fac­tor, but it requires an exist­ing DMX inter­face. There’s an inte­grated device on page 15 that has a bat­tery enclosed also and sup­ports PoE, but it’s a bit big­ger (115x40x70mm) and sim­i­larly lacks the onboard micro­con­troller that the Blue­tooth device has.

The W-DMX might be bet­ter on power con­sump­tion, though, on account of the pos­si­bil­ity of receive-only mode that Blue­tooth lacks (though, of course, you can dis­able vis­i­bil­ity on Blue­tooth devices, which might assist). Both tech­nolo­gies use 2.4GHz spec­trum, which is pretty much all fun and unli­censed games.

Pos­si­bly more to come on this front if I can track down a suit­able con­tainer. I can shop for geek gear fairly effec­tively, but over­sized pieces of latex are a bit less my thing.

Com­ments re: ideas, criticism, etc., all quite welcome!

Nokia BH-501 and Windows XP Bluetooth A2DP playback

I had a sud­den com­pul­sion to make my BH-501 work at last with Win­dows after one too many late-night “I can’t use speak­ers and can no longer abide cables for crappy ear­phones” moments. If I had money enough to blow $200 on a decent set of head­phones expressly for the pur­pose of sit­ting at the PC late at night, sure, but I don’t at the minute. So my mobile’s Blue­tooth head­phones do a decent job in the time being.

The mag­i­cal secret, it seems, is Bluesoleil’s free EDR Blue­tooth man­ager soft­ware that allegedly has a 20MB data trans­fer lim­i­ta­tion per ses­sion until it’s pur­chased, but I’ve just down­loaded it and done over 50MB of audio data trans­fers in A2DP streams and it’s not com­plain­ing. Plus, Buy/Register under the Help menu are greyed out… so I don’t know quite how seri­ous they are about sell­ing this thing.

At any rate, it’s work­ing great for me, though my crappy Blue­tooth don­gle slows EVERYTHING about this com­puter down… must try another one, it’s not A2DP’s fault because when­ever I pair my mobile with it to sync the same thing hap­pens — even when nothing’s paired, as soon as you plug the don­gle in (USB) every­thing starts crawling.

All that said, BlueSoleil are great. Works well.

Bluetooth. Awesome.

I can’t believe I’ve been miss­ing out on this for so long. It’s use­ful for so much more than hands­free head­sets and brain-killing wire­less headphones!

My phone has a pre­sen­ter mode when paired with a PC (and, yes, it can be used as a mouse as well… but I’d never do that :P) and works at a range of at least five meters (which was kind of as far as I could walk whilst still see­ing a screen in this place). You’d pay $90 for that kinda gad­get on its own!

The only prob­lem I’ve got with it is the lack of a pre­sen­ter timer built in — if it had that, it’d be per­fect. Guess that’s what you pay the $90 for these days :P

If I ever said any­thing bad about Blue­tooth just being a gim­mick, con­sider it suf­fi­ciently retracted.

# by Josh on January 4th, 2007 Tags: ,
| 3 Comments »

You are not here. Or, the Problem with Headphones and Office Chairs.

I decided to move across the room, the head­phones fairly solidly plugged in (around a desk and a block of mar­ble) had fairly dif­fer­ent ideas. Desk accou­trements went fly­ing, head­phones remained firmly teth­ered, Josh sus­tains whiplash. It’s like a seat­belt for your head only really, really, not.

The solu­tion? Either a printer sit­u­ated upstairs so the tray out­put falls down to me (nifty but occa­sion­ally irri­tat­ing) or wire­less head­phones (and, really, I get enough Bluetooth/mobile/whatever else radi­a­tion as it is). Or just buy­ing less comfy head­phones so I don’t for­get they’re sit­u­ated on my head. The ones at present keep my ears warm. Yes, even with this much hair my ears get cold. Yes, nearly in sum­mer after heat waves. Yes, my cir­cu­la­tion is that bad, etc. Shut up and leave me to stran­gle myself with a head­phone cord.

# by Josh on October 22nd, 2006 Tags: ,
| 1 Comment »

Mmm. 3CCD goodness.

I was @swylie’s today, doing var­i­ous stuff, and saw an incred­i­bly cool cam­era.  Gim­micky in parts, but still unde­ni­ably func­tional and gen­er­ally cool.  I *think* it was a Sony DCR-TRV950 MiniDV cam, but wasn’t tak­ing notes… if you read this, Steve, feel free to correct ;)

The image qual­ity was drool-worthy (3CCD’s do that), with a full colour(!) eye­piece, as well as an enor­mous flip-out screen (if the cam­era is the TRV950, then it’s offi­cially 3.5″ — bloody huge, com­pared to all other hand­held cam­era screens I’ve seen, at any rate) which is touch sen­si­tive and comes com­plete with sty­lus!!  It was kind of scary, though — I kept think­ing I was going to poke a hole in the screen… was the only un-cool thing about the whole experience.

As for the gim­micks?  Hmm.  Blue­tooth.  Need I say more?  No?  Thankyou.  Net­work stream­ing over Blue­tooth is bla­tantly ridicu­lous, espe­cially on what is meant to be a pro­sumer class cam­era.  That said, I wouldn’t mind see­ing how it worked, just as a once off.  I can’t see it being great qual­ity, see­ing the through­put of Blue­tooth is appar­ently less than 750Kbps, as opposed to the enour­mous powah of Firewire (or i.Link, as Sony insists on call­ing it) at 400Mbps, but still… it’d make for a cool tech demo.

Long story short?  I want one…

# by Josh on June 14th, 2004 Tags: , ,
| No Comments »