My Quasi-static IP

So, I use a Dynamic DNS ser­vice to point the CNAME alias record home. on this domain to, sur­pris­ingly enough, my home Inter­net con­nec­tion with Tel­stra Big­Pond (or pud­dle, whatever).

I’m using a Dynamic DNS ser­vice instead of just set­ting up an A record (much sim­pler, plus that would mean I could have a catchall on the domain… my cur­rent DNS host — also my reg­is­trar, Joker.com — doesn’t like wild­card CNAME records, though) because, the­o­ret­i­cally, my plan only has a dynamic IP address prone to chang­ing at any given moment. Dynamic DNS ser­vices really should only be used by peo­ple with dynamic IP addresses, for a num­ber of rea­sons… the most obvi­ous one being that they are designed to change, and expire if you don’t let them. (At least with Dyn­DNS, which is pretty excel­lent for the price… free.)

With this in mind, I received this mes­sage today:

A host­name you have reg­is­tered with Dynamic Net­work Ser­vices at Dyn­DNS, sn0239410.dnsalias.net, with cur­rent IP address 60.225.85.25, will expire in the next 5 days. This expi­ra­tion is due to an auto­matic time­out; your host has not been updated for 30 days, and hosts are removed after not being updated for 35 days. This is our pol­icy to pre­vent a stag­nant DNS sys­tem. Users with sta­tic IP addresses can use the Sta­tic DNS sys­tem, which does not have this timeout.

There’s more, I just can’t be both­ered repeat­ing it here.

That’s the fourth time I’ve read that para­graph in sep­a­rate mes­sages. That exact para­graph. Yeah, not even the IP changed.

To give that some time scale, see the quoted por­tion above: “hosts are removed after not being updated for 35 days”. I’ve man­u­ally touched my subdomain’s record once every 35 days or there­abouts for the last four months. Before that, the same sit­u­a­tion existed, but then only for three months. Before that? Two. (And before that was iiNet, back in the day, and that doesn’t really bear com­ment­ing… every time your modem dis­con­nected you’d get a new IP, and some­times more often! Though it seems to have improved since…)

Seems to me as though Tel­stra is slowly and qui­etly mak­ing its dynamic IPs more and more sta­tic as broad­band adop­tion picks up. So, Tel­stra, when are you giv­ing us (mere plebs) IPv6?

# by Josh on October 1st, 2005 Tags: , , ,
| No Comments »

Wonders of working remotely

Last night for about two hours, with under twenty min­utes notice, four peo­ple com­mu­ni­cated aurally and simultaneously(ish) watched and could inter­act with the same screen.

Photos from each location combined

VoIP (using Skype on Linux) wasn’t play­ing nice, so we wound up using a PSTN, with the phone at the remote end (remote to me, any­way) hooked into a sound con­sole with three micro­phones patched in (as well as com­puter audio, but that doesn’t bear men­tion­ing!) for each par­tic­i­pant. Using VNC (I’d have pre­ferred to use MS RDC, but that doesn’t allow mul­ti­ple simul­ta­ne­ous users on one ses­sion), we col­lab­o­ra­tively worked on a web­site design in Pho­to­shop simul­ta­ne­ously from oppo­site ends of Sydney.

Sure, it helps that one end was a sound stu­dio, and that both ends were using real — as opposed to 256 or 512k “broadband” — broadband… but that just goes to prove even more firmly how much tech­nol­ogy rocks!

# by Josh on June 30th, 2005 Tags: , , , , ,
| No Comments »

Consumer sovereignty equals piracy

In an eco­nomic sys­tem where con­sumer sov­er­eignty is famed to exist, such that there is suf­fi­cient choice across most mar­kets to per­mit a degree of choice by the buyer, for which mar­keters com­pete, the major stu­dios (this dis­course is lim­ited to movie pro­duc­tion, for rea­sons which shall be dis­closed) are doing some­thing hor­ri­bly wrong. Many would argue that the state of the movie indus­try at present does not hon­our the notion of con­sumer sov­er­eignty by virtue of the range/variety or qual­ity of con­tent avail­able — but I refute this; not only because it is untrue (the con­sumer is sov­er­eign, even if only pre­sented with fewer options), but also because there are far more sub­stan­tial mis­takes being made with regard to this, such that any offence in the afore­men­tioned man­ner becomes some­what irrel­e­vant. Read the rest of this entry »

Adobe turns evil

Okay, so I just tried to down­load Acro­bat Reader 7. I’ve got no rea­son to pay for the full prod­uct, as free alter­na­tives suf­fice for all my PDF cre­ation needs… maybe Abobe is get­ting upset and decid­ing to trash what was pre­vi­ously the best cross-platform doc­u­ment shar­ing for­mat ever.

Well, what­ever. I’m still using PDF doc­u­ments, and prob­a­bly will be for a while, but I’m going to rant about it any­way. So there’s an installer, right? Okay. Pre­ferred method of instal­la­tion: Evil Adobe Down­load man­ager. Option for nor­mal down­load? Yup. Why didn’t I use it? Call me stu­pid or some­thing… I’ll get to exactly why.

So last week some time I was at Steve’s office, and he said that Acro­bat Reader 7 is loads faster than 6. I’m not sure if I started danc­ing then and there, but it was good to hear. Today, I bother to do some­thing about it on this lap­top (which, inci­den­tally, has just had a long-overdue RAM upgrade, and still loads Acro­bat 6 like crap), which involved going to the Adobe web­site and fol­low­ing the links, then fill­ing out three drop­down menus to present me with more choices.

Lan­guage: Eng­lish.
Oper­at­ing Sys­tem: Win­dows ME
Con­nec­tion: Broadband

Won­der­ful, it’s offer­ing to let me down­load Adobe Reader 6. Again. I know I’m run­ning Win­dows ME and that’s a crime against human­ity. Right now, I’d argue that Adobe down­load soft­ware and inter­nal pol­icy is a crime against human­ity. Not only would it offer to let me down­load an old ver­sion of soft­ware, I also had my choice of spy­ware rid­den tool­bars and some crappy photo man­age­ment soft­ware which they’re pimp­ing like it’s actu­ally mak­ing them money. Scary, no? The first hit is always free… no, I’m not a cynic. Never.

Josh trots off to Download.com to try and grab the lat­est Reader “ille­gally”, just for the hell of it, to see if it’ll work on this com­puter. Download.com, searches, finds Acro­bat Reader, down­loads Acro­bat Reader, dis­cov­ers it’s actu­ally a crappy down­load stub (hey, I’m on snappy cable here, I don’t *do* check­ing file sizes!), which then pro­ceeds to down­load (unan­nounced) three dif­fer­ent pieces of soft­ware. “Ummmm.”

It fin­ishes down­load­ing these mys­te­ri­ous three com­po­nents. Installer one launches. Yahoo! Tool­bar? No thanks. Really, no thanks. No, really, take that tool­bar away from me before I do some­thing unto­ward with it. Crappy Adobe Photo man­age­ment dru… err… soft­ware? No thanks. Really, no thanks. If I cared that much for your crappy soft­ware, I’d ask for it. As it stands, I’m per­fectly happy with the most excel­lent Irfan­view on Win­dows, and mis­cel­la­neous web-based photo man­age­ment applications.

FINALLY. This is the part where I have the Acro­bat installer itself run. But no. “I don’t like your Oper­at­ing Sys­tem, you anti-consumerist pig. Go grov­el­ling to our bud­dies Microsoft and upgrade, quick smart. And buy some new hard­ware from some ven­dor that Microsoft approved so your new OS will run, okay? That’s right. In the mean­while, we’ll pun­ish you by mak­ing our reader soft­ware con­tinue to run just as slow on your crappy four-year-old OS.”

Rec­om­men­da­tion: Use plain text, or (if it’s absolutely nec­es­sary) valid (X)HTML, to send me doc­u­ments. I’ll receive them in a bet­ter mood. (This com­ment endures only until I move into the new house, get my Linux desk­top back, and can resume read­ing Adobe PDF files with­out even need­ing to see their prod­uct name. Ahh, Open Source.)

Wireless broadband on the cheap

Whirlpool have just announced (last night) the release of new broad­band plans from Veri­tel, with insane dis­counts and ben­e­fits for Whirlpool vis­i­tors. Read the rest of this entry »

I am not dead.

Really!  Just been pre-occupied with things, that’s all.

And this is take two, as Mozilla crashed.  Actu­ally, why am I typ­ing this in Mozilla?  Kon­queror has nice spell check­ing and stuff!  I’m nor­mally pretty good, but a sec­ond opin­ion can’t hurt, now can it?  *switches browsers*

Ah, that’s bet­ter.  Haha, “Mozilla” is show­ing up in red text… no, we’re not anti-competitive ;)

Yay.  So, about… life.  Sem­i­nar pre­sen­ta­tion.  I’ve already bitched to half the world (so it seems… half my world, any­way… prob­a­bly more!) about how poorly I thought it went, but hey, for the other part of my world (the purely-connected, non-“Met” half), I’m rant­ing here, too.  Feel free to ignore me if you think I just need to STFU and get over it.

Yeah.  This sem­i­nar was meant to go for ten min­utes.  Mine went for four­teen.  I’ve never been great (read: utterly hope­less) at tim­ing things, espe­cially of this nature, and brevity has never been a strong point either (phonecalls should be billed in 30 minute blocks, not per 30 sec­onds!).  This, how­ever, was appalling.  As I said, it went for four­teen.  That isn’t too bad, in and of itself…

Had I fin­ished.  Know­ing full well that my tim­ing was prob­a­bly way out, the sem­i­nar was pre­pared with des­ig­nated “exit points”, for use in a sce­nario such as… oh, say, the one that occurred.  Essen­tially, there were pre­ma­ture con­clu­sions which wouldn’t appear pre­ma­ture should I have to use them.

All that is based on the pre­sump­tion that I actu­ally DO think to use them… oh, yes, that old “thought” thing.  Evi­dently too much.  So I hit a break in pre­sen­ta­tion, and asked how long I had gone for: they said 14 min­utes.  I thought I was per­haps just over 10, 12 at the most.  It shouldn’t have been panic induc­ing, but then, I’d just endured a point­less 30 – 45 sec­onds of DVD footage due to impos­si­ble cue­ing (my frog, the but­tons on the front of those things are fid­dly.  Give me a remote any­day.), and knew I needed to make up for that some­how.  I don’t know.  I basi­cally for­got that nice con­clu­sion which was glar­ing fiercely up at me from the sheet I held less than a meter from my face.

That, of course, isn’t the thing which annoys me most.  If my stu­pid­ity doesn’t affect the over­all qual­ity of con­tent deliv­ered, then that’d be no prob­lem.  Unfor­tu­nately, with­out my use of an appro­pri­ate con­clu­sion, the whole thing falls down some­what.  The study of ONE appro­pri­a­tion, no mat­ter how in-depth or well pre­sented that may be, does not con­sti­tute “a range of” other contexts.

I looked over the pre­sen­ta­tion again, and I’ve esti­mated that were I to run the full length of my pre­pared con­tent, it would have gone for approx­i­mately 25 min­utes.  Damn, my tim­ing sucks.  I say “pre­pared” con­tent because I should have liked to go longer… per­haps I’m not a pub­lic speaker for a reason? ;)

Despite all that, I con­tinue to agree with oth­ers who have described this assess­ment as one of, if not the most enjoy­able assess­ment they’ve ever undertaken.

But it’s over.  So that prob­a­bly means I should stop work­ing on it, and focus on myr­iad other assess­ments build­ing up, hey?;)

Oh, it’s not so bad.  A mod­er­ately huge busi­ness thing on Mon­day, which I’m a tad ner­vous about, an Eng­lish lis­ten­ing task on Wednes­day, which I could care less about, but not by much, and a Mod­ern His­tory essay which is due Thurs­day.  Then a week?  Maybe two?  I don’t know… until yearly exams.  Bleh!

And a cer­tain Herr Goldrick is try­ing to con­vince me to do HSC stuff.  I’m uncer­tain why.  Appar­ently is shall “reas­sure” year 12.  More so than paid staff shall?  Bleh.  I don’t see why a cer­tain per­son con­tin­ues to be employed.  It’s funny, see­ing he’ll be present for their rehearsals, and yet Goldrick is con­vinced that I need to be there because I was there for the tri­als.  Yes, well, cer­tain oth­ers who shall be wit­ness­ing afore­men­tioned rehearsals WEREN’T there for the tri­als, because they had bet­ter things to do with their time.

Grrr.

To go off on a com­plete tan­gent, my par­ents are going to New Zealand tomor­row evening.  (YAY!)  This’ll prob­a­bly mean a several-hundred fold increase in pro­duc­tiv­ity, for var­i­ous rea­sons (namely that there is no pres­sure to “appear” to be doing work of any par­tic­u­lar kind — time man­age­ment CAN occur unheeded, thankyou very much).  The lovely LCD device is going with them, in the hope of attain­ing a tax break… I don’t know how all that stuff works, so I won’t spec­u­late further…

That’s the last few days in a nut-shell.  Today was a write-off.  Absolutely.  Appar­ently Heath is upset about the en mass deser­tion of his school, but given that they’ve never had an estab­lished “Bring your school books and work in case it rains” pol­icy, I don’t think he has any right to be.

I left it too late to escape, and sub­se­quently lost a day which could have been spent tend­ing to assess­ments.  St. Andrews Cathe­dral School embraces aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment and effi­cient time usage.  What a joke.  Six hours of absolute noth­ing.  Sure, we did work in physics, the one sub­ject I’m adamant about drop­ping.  Won­der­ful.  Other sub­jects?  Oh, I’m sure I could have worked, had I come pre­pared with BOOKS.

I’d like to take this oppor­tu­nity to extend my grat­i­tude to the admin­is­tra­tion of the school for their astound­ing short-sightedness in deal­ing with this sit­u­a­tion.  Duty-of-Care and tru­ancy is one mat­ter, actively refus­ing parental per­mis­sion to release stu­dents so that they may pos­si­bly make some use of their day is quite another.

Appar­ently he is angry.  Well, so am I.  I value my time more than that.  I was look­ing for­ward to this car­ni­val, but I can cope with it being can­celled — I’d like to be able to get work done in it’s place, though.

“Nor­mal school day” was a fond catch-cry of admin­is­tra­tion.  I cer­tainly hope you don’t con­sider that nor­mal.  This isn’t like broad­band, there is no such thing as a “fast churn” process between schools.  Not that I’d really con­sider mov­ing, any­way — I do love SACS, despite all its capri­cious odd­i­ties.  This sort of thing does irri­tate, though.  Yes, the sit­u­a­tion was unavoid­able, but the response left much to be desired.

Hah, the male parental unit is a source of much amuse­ment.  In the morn­ing, whilst hopes of escape still dwelled in the ech­e­lons of the imag­i­na­tion, I called the parentals in hope of them call­ing and ensur­ing some means of ess-cap-ee.  He was in a meet­ing, but sent a TEXT mes­sage as a per­mis­sion to leave.  You have no idea how hard I fought not to fall off my chair laughing.

“I give per­mis­sion 4 josh 2 go home now that the car­ni­val is cancelled”

No joke.  I haven’t laughed so hard because of a text mes­sage EVER!  Mrs. Earle found it just as amus­ing, hehehe.  That ele­ment of humour made the day lastable, methinks ;)

Any­way.  I’m off to com­pose an essay.  Or some­thing.  Hooray for ridicu­lous SMS messages!