Exaggerated estimate

From Apple’s Quick­time Pro webpage:

Pro­fes­sional stu­dios around the world spend mil­lions of dol­lars and man-hours pro­duc­ing com­mer­cial enter­tain­ment. Please don’t steal their work or in ten years, it will cost $50(2) to see a movie in the the­ater [sic]. But, you can find lots of mate­r­ial on the Web that’s legal to cut, copy and remix. Look for the Cre­ative Com­mons license and add to the world’s culture.

(2) Exag­ger­ated estimate.

What. The.

It’s hard to tell whether they’re mock­ing the MPAA’s of the world or being seri­ous. In which case, it’s great to see they’re being hon­est, but, again… what the?

Oh, and I still haven’t bought Quick­time Pro. I went there via their trail­ers site and saw this line in the footer: “Bro­ken Movie icons? Quick­Time 7 is now required to view Trail­ers– and it’s free.”

Clearly, Quick­time 7 isn’t free if you paid for 6. And, so far as I know, there’s no way to run mul­ti­ple ver­sions of Quick­time in tan­dem. So if you want to be able to view new gen­er­a­tion con­tent being cre­ated, you’re basi­cally locked into a con­tin­ual upgrade cycle. Which is a load of crap.

Also a load of crap is their Aus­tralian pric­ing for Quick­time Pro, which is $AU44 ver­sus $US29 (about $AU38 at time of writ­ing). The bits are iden­ti­cal. Don’t charge me more. I have for­eign exchange trans­ac­tion fees added to my card if I pur­chase some­thing in a dif­fer­ent cur­rency, but it’s not any­thing near six dol­lars (try twenty cents or some­thing ridicu­lously small). And it doesn’t cost you six dol­lars more to send an email to Aus­tralia instead of to your US customers.

I’m in this bizarre pseudo-closed-source land at the minute and I’m really fear­ful for the longevity of con­tent sit­ting where I am now. In terms of rel­a­tive open­ness, Apple aren’t look­ing too crash hot right at the minute…

# by Josh on November 12th, 2006 Tags: , ,
| 2 Comments »

Jeyo SMS for Outlook

Screenshot: Jeyo Mobile Extender in Outlook 2002 receiving an SMS

A very use­ful pro­gramme for when you just can’t be stuffed reach­ing across to the phone sit­ting a few cen­time­ters away from you on the desk ;-) Or, for those of us who man­age to not notice a phone going off less than a meter away from their head, but will be instantly bugged beyond belief by a popup alert on their screen into respond­ing. My SMS response rate has got nearly as bad as my email fol­lowups this last cou­ple of weeks, so it’s prob­a­bly helpful.

Oh, and it’s also use­ful for ‘back­ing up’ (yeah yeah, onsite = bad, etc.) /copying/pasting URLs, etc. in SMS. Jeyo doesn’t do MMS/PXT at all which is a bit of a bum­mer but it’s quite cool apart from that. I’m still decid­ing if it’s worth twenty bucks (Australian).

It oper­ates through ActiveSync so you’ve got to have that going as well… which you prob­a­bly would any­way if you own a PDA in any way asso­ci­ated with a desk­top PC (weird *nix/mac types excepted — but as if Mac users would use any­thing other than a Palm! Well, maybe Black­berry have a foot in there, but it’s prob­a­bly too cor­po­rate for them hip­pies — tongue firmly in cheek). It kinda bugs me that this func­tion­al­ity isn’t avail­able for free from some­one, actu­ally, but whatever.

I can now send SMS for ~15¢ Aus­tralian through Skype, for ~5½¢ (real cost) using my mobile through Out­look 2002, or wait til peo­ple are on MSN and then send them what­ever for free. Clearly, we pay for con­ve­nience. And don’t really value sub-gold-coin amounts of money.

# by Josh on October 10th, 2006 Tags: , ,
| 2 Comments »

Readers

Ouch. All my sub­jects require read­ers and this semes­ter comes to a grand total of $106.25 (25 cents they charged on top for my using a credit card – the reader pric­ing itself isn’t that erratic). I thought I’d escaped lightly this semes­ter until I both­ered check­ing the UCC web­site, which kindly informed me all my sub­jects had read­ers. And I plan to actu­ally read them. Shock, horror.

Has any­one else noticed this blog has sud­denly become all about uni?

# by Josh on July 24th, 2006 Tags:
| 2 Comments »

Loving about uni

One thing I’m lov­ing about uni already is the com­plete lack of com­mer­cial intru­sion. With the excep­tion of wannabe-activist-emulating adver­tis­ing (you know the kind… Comm­Bank “Free is Good” adver­tis­ing in the form of chalked stair­ways, badges, etc.) and pro­lific party pos­ter­ing, I can wan­der around the USyd cam­pus for a day and not feel the need (née ‘want’, the aim of mar­ket­ing being the trans­for­ma­tion of ‘wants’ into ‘needs’) or com­pul­sion to spend money on any­thing. Well, except books. I’m still feel­ing guilty I don’t own all the books for all of my sub­jects yet… but *cries* they’re expen­sive and if I wait I can get them secondhand!

Stu­pid Eng­lish went and pre­scribed edi­tions but hadn’t really made that ter­ri­bly clear on the course out­line online… so bleh, time to sell some books back! Greek (yes, I’m doing Greek… has this story been told here? Prob­a­bly not. What­ever. I’m learn­ing Clas­si­cal Greek right up until when I fail mis­er­ably and drop out! Non-Latin-alphabets scare me.) cost… too much. Was about $90 or some­thing I think for two texts… so I can’t quit now, which is good I guess. I’m get­ting some Clas­sics texts from TextbookExchange.com.au (so good! go sign up!) which is nice. Phi­los­o­phy, mer­ci­fully, only has a reader (but that was like… $32 or some­thing, which is kinda expen­sive for a bunch of pho­to­copied stuff (I think) but saves so much has­sle it was read­ily handed over).

Then there was an amus­ing inci­dent with pur­chas­ing read­ings online but not being able to find where the online-only queue was. I saw the line at the UCC was absolutely mas­sive and assumed there must be a dou­ble queue for online/prepay (I have a Visa card now, yay. Try­ing not to ever actu­ally USE it, heh.) and so I joined the line so I wouldn’t be queue jump­ing. Hah. I got to nearly-the-end-of-the-line and saw a sign say­ing “Pre-paid/online orders” and quickly switched lanes. Ah well :P Les­son rather decid­edly learnt! Mind you, the nor­mal queue is more intim­i­dat­ing than it is actu­ally long. Moved really quickly. So I might pass on the online-ordering next time and save myself 50 cents or what­ever the card charge is, heh.

Another really inter­est­ing thing has been see­ing who’s doing var­i­ous sub­jects. Peter (Notarus? I can never spell his last name…), for exam­ple, was in the same Clas­si­cal Mythol­ogy lec­ture as me this arvo. Just didn’t really think of him as an Arts per­son, I guess… heh, he thought the same of me though ;-) I’m find­ing myself semi-regularly apol­o­gis­ing (in jest :-)) for being an IT per­son who’s inter­ested in… more inter­est­ing things! (another wink here… typ­ing lots of emoti­cons in blog posts is bad!)

But it’s cool. I haven’t encoun­tered any­one who hasn’t been nice/has been judge­men­tal yet. It prob­a­bly helps that every­one in all of my sub­jects seems a lit­tle bit lost around the place… up to and includ­ing a bunch of third– and fourth-year stu­dents in my Clas­si­cal Greek course whom I encoun­tered whilst equally lost look­ing for the room for our first lec­ture. Four of us met in ad-hoc fash­ion out­side the Vice-Chancellor’s office (because that was where – log­i­cally – the room should have been! *aban­dons try­ing to deduce order from room numbers/names), and wan­dered aim­lessly around the Quad for a while (we knew what build­ing, just not what sec­tion!) before finally find­ing a sign marked “Greek Room”. It was reas­sur­ing to know I wasn’t the only lost one!

Phi­los­o­phy and Eng­lish presently feel the most inter­est­ing of what I’m doing, but I take it that could be in part because I know what to expect from both (to an extent) and could prob­a­bly hold my own with­out too much guid­ance in both. The other two (Clas­si­cal Greek and Mythol­ogy) I’ve fairly lit­er­ally flung myself into with a con­cep­tion that either/or could be inter­est­ing and/or ben­e­fi­cial to study, but with very lit­tle idea as to either their con­tent or their method. I got to see Tori for half an hour today and laughed inwardly as she expressed her frus­tra­tion at peo­ple who didn’t get stuff in her Chi­nese tuts, think­ing “That’s going to be me as soon as we start tuto­ri­als for Greek next week!”. So so com­pletely lost. Any­way, on that note, I should prob­a­bly go and look over some stuff. My Yel­low­card CD re-construction fin­ished… *retreats to bed­room with music and read­ings and books and stuff*

Telstra vs the mess that is Australia’s copyright system

In an exchange between Phil Tripp, a music media com­men­ta­tor, and Tel­stra Cor­po­rate Affairs man­ager Craig Mid­dle­ton, it’s revealed that the record companies/distributors are just like the rest of us.

Craig Mid­dle­ton said this:

No I am not say­ing iPod users can down­load directly into iTunes. But they can down­load and burn CDs. With a CD there is no need to ‘engi­neer’ any­thing with iTunes — although it is ille­gal to rip from CD onto iPod. As the Syd­ney Morn­ing Her­ald once pointed out there is no legal way to use an iPod — but that makes a lot of us crim­i­nals
:-)

Then Phil Tripp (albeit under a pseu­do­nym) fired this back:

And I’m one of the biggest crim­i­nals around with a suc­ces­sion of three gen­er­a­tions of pods with 11,000 songs on one now and a hard drive with 26,000 songs – but all legal from my own record collection.

SO what you sug­gest I do is use a PC to down­load songs legally from BP, then burn to CD and then I can trans­fer these over to an iPod. KEWL! You got me. Any chance that BP is going to do the 99 cent down­loads again for Novem­ber if iTunes launches?

Tel­stra pulled out the lawyers.

Phil sug­gested that Tel­stra encour­ages cus­tomers to cir­cum­vent its dig­i­tal rights man­age­ment pro­tec­tions. In fact, Tel­stra in no way advo­cates or con­dones this type of action by cus­tomers. Trans­fer­ring Big­Pond Music down­loads from a CD to an iPod or other device is an infringe­ment of copy­right. It is also a breach of the terms and con­di­tions that cus­tomers agree to when they sign-up to use Big­Pond Music. Craig made this clear in his email to Phil by say­ing “it is ille­gal to rip from CD onto iPod.”

Tel­stra is extremely dis­ap­pointed that Phil chose to mis­rep­re­sent his exchange with Craig on the themusic.com.au website.

That is, of course, assum­ing smi­ley faces have absolutely nil seman­tic value. Bull crap. (I try to keep this site clean, and that’s prob­a­bly one of the stronger exple­tives I’ve used here. This deba­cle irks me, lots.)

Tel­stra, just like the rest of us, fully recog­nises what con­sumers will do with DRM’d media. Namely, what­ever the hell they can and want to. No-one reads “terms of ser­vice” for B2C ser­vices, unless they’re secu­rity para­noid (I’ve been known to, but only when I really don’t trust a source – cer­tainly not because I’m afraid of pros­e­cu­tion!), and dis­trib­u­tors know it.

Record com­pa­nies are a bunch of ostriches, it’s true, so maybe they’re the only ones who haven’t cot­toned on to this fact yet. This whole DRM thing is a mas­sive façade to con­vince the record indus­try they do, in fact, have some con­trol over the dis­tri­b­u­tion of their music. Here’s some news: they don’t. You prob­a­bly didn’t hear it here first.

Record companies suck

In today’s news, iTMS Aus­tralia launches with­out Sony, pre­sum­ably because they’re greedy, uncom­pro­mis­ing bas­tards. I’d like to be sued for defama­tion on that com­ment (because, you know, they’d get awarded such mas­sive dam­ages for a blog this size), because then at least the real rea­son would come out, either way. I’m inclined to think they’re far more evil than Apple, but per­haps that’s just PR spin. Hav­ing said that, here’s evi­dence to the con­trary from an AppleTalk Aus­tralia inter­view with CD Baby founder, Derek Sivers:

Keep in mind : Apple is not screw­ing musi­cians. Labels are screw­ing musi­cians. Apple pays 70 cents per 99-cent down­load. If the artist has signed their music over to a label, they don’t own their music any­more. The label does. So Apple pays the label 70 cents per song, and the label pays the artist… what… a penny? Two? Noth­ing at all? But when an artist is NOT signed to a label, when they’re going through CD Baby for exam­ple, we only keep a 9% cut and pay 91% of all income directly to the artists every week. Our account­ing is wide open so they can see every dol­lar every day, and it all goes to the artist every week, with­out fail, for over 7 years now.

Also, I’ve just dis­cov­ered that iTunes users, even on Win­dows, can rip CDs with sup­posed “Copy Con­trol” tech­nol­ogy with­out even hav­ing to resort to the typ­i­cal Shift key “hack” (heh, and, in the US, press­ing Shift at that point in time is entirely ille­gal. Remove those copy­right cir­cum­ven­tion devices from your key­boards, Amer­ica!!) to pre­vent the load­ing of sup­posed restrict­ing tech­nolo­gies. I guess this means iTunes is now ille­gal under the DMCA, too?

For the record, the CD in ques­tion was Placebo’s 2003 “Sleep­ing with Ghosts” album, pub­lished by Vir­gin. At least they didn’t have the audac­ity to use the stan­dard CD logo on it (because these copy-control things are out­side of Red Book spec).

Picking on the SMH some more

In today’s paper, an arti­cle enti­tled “Wages crack the $1000 bar­rier”, came this spot of genius.

A pay packet of $1000 a week is no longer any­thing to brag about.

Full-time adult ordinary-time earn­ings — the bench­mark for Australia’s aver­age wage — rose to $1008.10 a week in the three months to May 31, or $52,432 a year, the Bureau of Sta­tis­tics announced yesterday.

Full-time women work­ers are yet to reach the new pay land­mark, aver­ag­ing $906 a week com­pared with men on $1064.

Right, so, I’m throw­ing in a dis­claimer here. I don’t do maths as a sub­ject, and haven’t for a while. But I think I know how to aver­age two num­bers — cor­rect me if I’m wrong. It goes some­thing like “add them together, and divide by two”.

Women earn $906, men earn $1064. That adds to be $1970. We’re already guess­ing it’s wrong, because it’s impos­si­ble to get 10 cents from that. But hey, I’ll do the sum any­way: it’s $985. And no cents.

It seems there’s more than a few work­ers of dubi­ous gen­der in Australia…

Ah, it appears Nick has dis­cov­ered where I went wrong. The ten cents thing did seem a lit­tle too… odd… to be straight out incorrect!

# by Josh on August 19th, 2005 Tags: , ,
| 2 Comments »