Dilating accomodation

So peo­ple stay­ing with us have moved out and the house now feels MUCH too big instead of just too big. I’m wish­ing there would be more on one floor/less open space at the minute, because it’s cold and I have to walk fur­ther to the book­shelf down­stairs and because I’m here rarely enough dur­ing times when other peo­ple are that I’m not con­cerned about the noise of prox­im­ity at present. Even when I am, we’re in the same room and noise wouldn’t be sig­nif­i­cantly impacted. Part of an ongo­ing dis­sat­is­fac­tion with every­thing, I think.

I’d love some­where smaller with car­pets and solid walls painted twenty years ago in some incon­ceiv­able colour (as in, how could they have pos­si­bly thought that attrac­tive?) and no need for stairs (unless it were a ter­race, in which case stairs are per­mis­si­ble) and with no space for com­put­ers (I’d have to sell this thing and get a lap­top instead) but room enough for one big desk — not in my room so I couldn’t put ran­dom existing-paraphenalia upon it (deodor­ant cans, clothes, ran­dom paper, keys, wal­let, cam­eras) or the chair beneath it. The desk would have room at the back for an assort­ment of books within ready reach, but not imped­ing upon the work­space. I sup­pose that would make it about 115cm (45 inches) deep… it must also be wide enough for a lap­top at one end that I could com­fort­ably push out of the way.

A sun room would be excel­lent. One of those things you find in flats that’s com­pletely use­less for pretty much every­thing, but for the stor­age of books at one end of and read­ing in. West-facing, prefer­ably, so one could enjoy a book in the win­ter after­noon sun after the room has reached a com­fort­able tem­per­a­ture over the course of the day. I may regret that deci­sion in sum­mer, but there are always cur­tains (or rolling shades; not blinds, they are too clinical).

The bed­room would be small with a sep­a­rate wardrobe (the wardrobe itself is merely the object of nos­tal­gia), such that there remained fairly lit­tle space – on the walls, espe­cially. I have never had time for cul­ti­vat­ing char­ac­ter in one’s bed­room — it always appears messy but I can­not com­mit to plac­ing any­thing upon the walls. I will place a cal­en­dar there, duti­fully, every year… and then for­get to turn the pages. At present I am enjoy­ing Leu­nig — I sup­pose I could arbitar­ily turn months to look at the pic­tures, as it is not as though the thing gets very much use. I live in the room next door for organ­i­sa­tion (yes, IT) though the hand­held now resides in my bed­room — I inten­tion­ally have wire­less dis­abled to keep it out. My room is a haven for chaotic read­ing, hur­ried — but immensely enjoy­able — aca­d­e­mic con­sump­tion. Why I fail to spend more time in there is a mys­tery, prob­a­bly in some way related to mess of clothes and so forth. Par­tially a rug instead of car­pet, which means the chair gets stuck. Par­tially the chair being on wheels instead of fixed. Par­tially the desk being cov­ered in afore­men­tioned items (can you have fore­men­tioned items, mean­ing items to be men­tioned in the hypo­thet­i­cal future? I refuse to believe aforementioned/forementioned can be syn­onyms). The actual rea­son why is a mys­tery cloaked in my own propen­sity to sit here and blog instead of just sit­ting down and get­ting things done.

One day, you see, I’m going to quit this web gig and unin­stall my five browsers (well, four of them) and MSN and feed reader and email client and remove my net­work card and then start pay­ing the uni­ver­sity $2 a month for dialup and not bother to renew my domain name and stop check­ing my Gmail account and just use my uni email address (which I will check using the web inter­face tool, and have “Sent using Horde/IMP” appended to all my out­go­ing mes­sages). Then, I’ll get rid of the mobile, and pos­si­bly my desk­top com­puter. I’ll sit qui­etly read­ing books, papers, essays, and maybe even write some­thing use­ful after a while.

Then I’ll dis­cover that all I have done is trans­fer my focus, when I find myself growl­ing at ridicu­lous ideas and writ­ing angry let­ters, beam­ing hugely at char­ac­ter­ful irreg­u­lar­i­ties in works con­sis­tent with that in oth­ers and begin­ning to take advan­tage of the postal ser­vice. Then, the extent of the prob­lem will be truly known, when even the human­i­ties remain dis­tinctly inhu­man and detached.

Can’t I get any­thing right?

# by Josh Street on August 3rd, 2006 Tags: , , ,
| 5 Comments »

Cru study camp party live visuals

Went pretty well I’d say. Not that it’s really my call to make :) Seemed rather short despite my lack of fore­sight result­ing in me stand­ing for the dura­tion (I for­got to get a chair and then there were peo­ple in the room and chairs were too far away. Ones with arm­rests weren’t an option because they’re incon­ve­nient). Stand­ing was, how­ever, a neces­sity. Video was com­posed largely from ana­logue loops, with every­thing ulti­mately run­ning through effecTV. It did work amaz­ingly well (IMO) but it was a bit of a pain not to be able to use com­pos­ite cap­ture, which would have meant a big­ger cam­era not so con­strained by a USB lead. Just qui­etly, my web­cam kicks arse. Like, with plas­tic explo­sives or some­thing. It’s great even in low light! Obvi­ously it drops off into the nether-regions, but still… all-round goodness.

The grain wasn’t really a prob­lem any­way, because most of the vision was inten­tion­ally grungy/the input was only a seed for fur­ther dig­i­tal gen­e­sis, so that was cool. I’ve got to get the com­pos­ite input for this com­puter work­ing before I do another one of these things or get a real cap­ture card, though, because it’s a pain hav­ing only one cam­era. Usu­ally I’d flick it around to a light source bright enough that every­thing would flare out and then repo, or switch to a heav­ily dis­torted effect, or slide my fin­ger over it (it’s a web­cam, okay?) to black. The vision mixer didn’t get a work­out because I couldn’t get TV-out work­ing prop­erly in time (mostly because effecTV’s fullscreen mode did weird things to sync on com­pos­ite out­puts, but hey, VGA worked).

I’ve really got to learn how to use Pure­Data before next time, too. It looks so incred­i­bly pow­er­ful, wow. I don’t under­stand where it out­puts sources/runs, though. Looks great for rout­ing and fil­ter­ing stuff to the hilt, but where that all ends up is beyond me! Again, hope­fully before next time.

It just occurred to me that pretty much every cam­era with IEEE1394 on the planet can be used as a V4L source. D’oh. Maybe I should finally buy a real cam­era instead of some bor­ing cap­ture hard­ware. Cap­ture hard­ware doesn’t NEED to be bor­ing, if you’re in a Win­dows envi­ron­ment and need a device that does real-time effects… but I’m not $2500 enthu­si­as­tic about all this just yet. And prob­a­bly won’t be until it starts to have some abstract kind of earn­ing poten­tial… which I’m pretty okay with­out, but nev­er­the­less, it’s dif­fi­cult to jus­tify that going into a hole of depreciation.

So… for next time, more cam­eras mixed (with vision mixer) into cap­ture device, more cam­eras using FireWire, more effects custom-designed using Pure­Data, and dig­i­tal vision mix­ing with FreeJ. I’m happy with VGA out­put because you’re push­ing native res­o­lu­tion to the pro­jec­tor that way. I’m also not too con­cerned about PC resources/performance. Tonight I’d say it was online for 3.5 hours with­out a glitch (with the excep­tion of a kick-out 10 min­utes in, and I was still par­tially set­ting up and wasn’t par­tic­u­larly in the mid­dle of any­thing), run­ning from a USB source. There used to be a time when that would just not have been pos­si­ble with con­sumer gear (the cam­era cost about $90 – 110, which means it’s a rather-decent web­cam. Prob­a­bly, at this stage, one of the more expen­sive com­po­nents of my setup!)

Oh, and I didn’t get to record any of the per­for­mance, sorry. Gem recorded another person’s per­for­mance for me ear­lier in the evening, but I’m too tired to share that right now… prob­a­bly tomor­row, before Selo comes to my house and kicks my dog… err I mean camera’s SD card mem­ory. I gotta do it before this month ends, because I’m now hilar­i­ously over quota. It’s got to be all because uploads count, seri­ously! I’ve been doing nearly 1GB a month to Flickr alone. Any­way. Stop­ping ram­bling and start­ing sleeping.

# by Josh Street on June 30th, 2006 Tags: , , , , , ,
| No Comments »

ATO e-tax and Wine

The ATO’s e-tax appli­ca­tion is a pretty hor­ri­ble beast, and a per­fect exam­ple of some­thing that really should be a web appli­ca­tion — but it works on Wine near-perfectly. Sort of.

I just filled out my 2005 tax return on Linux, before get­ting to the final step and dis­cov­er­ing it wouldn’t print nor sub­mit elec­tron­i­cally (because, appar­ently, they can’t code and are depen­dent on Inter­net Explorer as a con­nec­tiv­ity layer — and yet they test for secu­rity before allow­ing you to down­load the pro­gram! Hah!)… but it would save just fine, so I copied my tax file across the net­work to a Win­dows com­puter (resent­ing all the while hav­ing to leave my chair, because I really shouldn’t have had to even leave my browser — In this instance Fire­fox — if they’d done this prop­erly) and imported, printed, and sub­mit­ted it elec­tron­i­cally with­out any sig­nif­i­cant problems.

Note that you can’t import a file from any­where — you need to actu­ally copy the file into the e-tax folder itself (prob­a­bly C:\etax2005) before e-tax will let you startup with­out cre­at­ing a new file. You’ve also got to enter your TFN again (pre­sum­ably as a mea­gre form of secu­rity) to get it to open the file.

It annoys me that they don’t even sup­port Mac users natively, instead say­ing that it will func­tion, if “suit­able Win­dows Emu­la­tor soft­ware” is installed. That’s so pre­sump­tu­ous I was tempted to fill in the sec­tion ask­ing for costs incurred in fil­ing the tax invoice, list­ing three licences for Win­dows XP pur­chased ear­lier this year (not really, but it’d be a nice revenge :)).

Okay, rant over.

# by Josh Street on July 28th, 2005 Tags: , , , , , , ,
| 2 Comments »

H.264 scares me

In an “its cool­ness chills me to the bone” kind of way. I’m scared because of what it appar­ently requires, and I’m scared because of the sup­posed qual­ity of it. I’ve down­loaded — prob­a­bly fool­ishly — a trailer for Bat­man Begins (hey, there isn’t much mate­r­ial out there!) in 1920x1080 res­o­lu­tion, and all my com­puter could do was crash. In Totem (xine) and MPlayer. Appar­ently the lat­est ver­sion of MPlayer should work with H.264, but I’m not pre­pared to break my apt upgrad­ing in order to test before the offi­cial pack­ages are avail­able — impa­tient though I am to see my Athlon 2200+ with 768MB of RAM get absolutely pun­ished dur­ing play­back of this video, I can wait a week or two.

Hav­ing said that, how­ever, MPlayer did man­age to decode the first 25 frames of (strangely enough) the higher res­o­lu­tion (1920x1080) video. If I had to give a rea­son for the image appear­ing to have bled, I’d say it’s because the appli­ca­tion was fail­ing to decode each frame in real­time, although I’m sure there are far more plau­si­ble expla­na­tions out there (like, oh, let’s see — the appli­ca­tion doesn’t offi­cially even sup­port H.264 at all in that ver­sion?). You can click on the image below to see a rat­ings advi­sory screen in tru­ely mean detail, even if it has bled a bit. And been com­pressed a bit. Okay, so it’s not really that great — but the resolution!

A screen capture

No, the real and present dan­ger at this point is that I will waltz across the room (or, you know, spin my chair around and move two metres or so) to an otherwise-perfectly-okay Pen­tium 3 run­ning Win­dows XP, and try installing Quick­time 7 to play­back the same file. Actu­ally, I’d be per­fectly happy if it could ade­quately play­back the 852x480 ver­sion, I think.

But then, it’s Bat­man, and I don’t think I could actu­ally care that much…

# by Josh Street on July 13th, 2005 Tags: , ,
| No Comments »

Imprisoned.

A short story, in which an imag­i­na­tive jour­ney occurs. Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh Street on October 23rd, 2004 Tags: ,
| 1 Comment »

Peta and the Great Red Shark

Last night the usual sus­pects went to a pro­duc­tion, and sat on the other side of the booth wall. Which was odd, but cool. My addi­tion to the wall was still sit­ting up there, keep­ing time nicely, which was pleas­ant to see… spec­u­la­tion con­tin­ues as to how long is shall remain, but you get that.

Actu­ally, a few more than the usual sus­pects — we were joined by Katyana, which was cool, and Sam also came to the party… it was like one big crazy fam­ily reunion! Our mis­sion, should we choose to accept it, was to stop our­selves from laugh­ing too hard before the pro­duc­tion com­menced. You have no idea how hard a task that is. Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh Street on September 5th, 2004 Tags: , , , ,
| 1 Comment »

I am not dead.

Really!  Just been pre-occupied with things, that’s all.

And this is take two, as Mozilla crashed.  Actu­ally, why am I typ­ing this in Mozilla?  Kon­queror has nice spell check­ing and stuff!  I’m nor­mally pretty good, but a sec­ond opin­ion can’t hurt, now can it?  *switches browsers*

Ah, that’s bet­ter.  Haha, “Mozilla” is show­ing up in red text… no, we’re not anti-competitive ;)

Yay.  So, about… life.  Sem­i­nar pre­sen­ta­tion.  I’ve already bitched to half the world (so it seems… half my world, any­way… prob­a­bly more!) about how poorly I thought it went, but hey, for the other part of my world (the purely-connected, non-“Met” half), I’m rant­ing here, too.  Feel free to ignore me if you think I just need to STFU and get over it.

Yeah.  This sem­i­nar was meant to go for ten min­utes.  Mine went for four­teen.  I’ve never been great (read: utterly hope­less) at tim­ing things, espe­cially of this nature, and brevity has never been a strong point either (phonecalls should be billed in 30 minute blocks, not per 30 sec­onds!).  This, how­ever, was appalling.  As I said, it went for four­teen.  That isn’t too bad, in and of itself…

Had I fin­ished.  Know­ing full well that my tim­ing was prob­a­bly way out, the sem­i­nar was pre­pared with des­ig­nated “exit points”, for use in a sce­nario such as… oh, say, the one that occurred.  Essen­tially, there were pre­ma­ture con­clu­sions which wouldn’t appear pre­ma­ture should I have to use them.

All that is based on the pre­sump­tion that I actu­ally DO think to use them… oh, yes, that old “thought” thing.  Evi­dently too much.  So I hit a break in pre­sen­ta­tion, and asked how long I had gone for: they said 14 min­utes.  I thought I was per­haps just over 10, 12 at the most.  It shouldn’t have been panic induc­ing, but then, I’d just endured a point­less 30 – 45 sec­onds of DVD footage due to impos­si­ble cue­ing (my frog, the but­tons on the front of those things are fid­dly.  Give me a remote any­day.), and knew I needed to make up for that some­how.  I don’t know.  I basi­cally for­got that nice con­clu­sion which was glar­ing fiercely up at me from the sheet I held less than a meter from my face.

That, of course, isn’t the thing which annoys me most.  If my stu­pid­ity doesn’t affect the over­all qual­ity of con­tent deliv­ered, then that’d be no prob­lem.  Unfor­tu­nately, with­out my use of an appro­pri­ate con­clu­sion, the whole thing falls down some­what.  The study of ONE appro­pri­a­tion, no mat­ter how in-depth or well pre­sented that may be, does not con­sti­tute “a range of” other contexts.

I looked over the pre­sen­ta­tion again, and I’ve esti­mated that were I to run the full length of my pre­pared con­tent, it would have gone for approx­i­mately 25 min­utes.  Damn, my tim­ing sucks.  I say “pre­pared” con­tent because I should have liked to go longer… per­haps I’m not a pub­lic speaker for a reason? ;)

Despite all that, I con­tinue to agree with oth­ers who have described this assess­ment as one of, if not the most enjoy­able assess­ment they’ve ever undertaken.

But it’s over.  So that prob­a­bly means I should stop work­ing on it, and focus on myr­iad other assess­ments build­ing up, hey?;)

Oh, it’s not so bad.  A mod­er­ately huge busi­ness thing on Mon­day, which I’m a tad ner­vous about, an Eng­lish lis­ten­ing task on Wednes­day, which I could care less about, but not by much, and a Mod­ern His­tory essay which is due Thurs­day.  Then a week?  Maybe two?  I don’t know… until yearly exams.  Bleh!

And a cer­tain Herr Goldrick is try­ing to con­vince me to do HSC stuff.  I’m uncer­tain why.  Appar­ently is shall “reas­sure” year 12.  More so than paid staff shall?  Bleh.  I don’t see why a cer­tain per­son con­tin­ues to be employed.  It’s funny, see­ing he’ll be present for their rehearsals, and yet Goldrick is con­vinced that I need to be there because I was there for the tri­als.  Yes, well, cer­tain oth­ers who shall be wit­ness­ing afore­men­tioned rehearsals WEREN’T there for the tri­als, because they had bet­ter things to do with their time.

Grrr.

To go off on a com­plete tan­gent, my par­ents are going to New Zealand tomor­row evening.  (YAY!)  This’ll prob­a­bly mean a several-hundred fold increase in pro­duc­tiv­ity, for var­i­ous rea­sons (namely that there is no pres­sure to “appear” to be doing work of any par­tic­u­lar kind — time man­age­ment CAN occur unheeded, thankyou very much).  The lovely LCD device is going with them, in the hope of attain­ing a tax break… I don’t know how all that stuff works, so I won’t spec­u­late further…

That’s the last few days in a nut-shell.  Today was a write-off.  Absolutely.  Appar­ently Heath is upset about the en mass deser­tion of his school, but given that they’ve never had an estab­lished “Bring your school books and work in case it rains” pol­icy, I don’t think he has any right to be.

I left it too late to escape, and sub­se­quently lost a day which could have been spent tend­ing to assess­ments.  St. Andrews Cathe­dral School embraces aca­d­e­mic achieve­ment and effi­cient time usage.  What a joke.  Six hours of absolute noth­ing.  Sure, we did work in physics, the one sub­ject I’m adamant about drop­ping.  Won­der­ful.  Other sub­jects?  Oh, I’m sure I could have worked, had I come pre­pared with BOOKS.

I’d like to take this oppor­tu­nity to extend my grat­i­tude to the admin­is­tra­tion of the school for their astound­ing short-sightedness in deal­ing with this sit­u­a­tion.  Duty-of-Care and tru­ancy is one mat­ter, actively refus­ing parental per­mis­sion to release stu­dents so that they may pos­si­bly make some use of their day is quite another.

Appar­ently he is angry.  Well, so am I.  I value my time more than that.  I was look­ing for­ward to this car­ni­val, but I can cope with it being can­celled — I’d like to be able to get work done in it’s place, though.

“Nor­mal school day” was a fond catch-cry of admin­is­tra­tion.  I cer­tainly hope you don’t con­sider that nor­mal.  This isn’t like broad­band, there is no such thing as a “fast churn” process between schools.  Not that I’d really con­sider mov­ing, any­way — I do love SACS, despite all its capri­cious odd­i­ties.  This sort of thing does irri­tate, though.  Yes, the sit­u­a­tion was unavoid­able, but the response left much to be desired.

Hah, the male parental unit is a source of much amuse­ment.  In the morn­ing, whilst hopes of escape still dwelled in the ech­e­lons of the imag­i­na­tion, I called the parentals in hope of them call­ing and ensur­ing some means of ess-cap-ee.  He was in a meet­ing, but sent a TEXT mes­sage as a per­mis­sion to leave.  You have no idea how hard I fought not to fall off my chair laughing.

“I give per­mis­sion 4 josh 2 go home now that the car­ni­val is cancelled”

No joke.  I haven’t laughed so hard because of a text mes­sage EVER!  Mrs. Earle found it just as amus­ing, hehehe.  That ele­ment of humour made the day lastable, methinks ;)

Any­way.  I’m off to com­pose an essay.  Or some­thing.  Hooray for ridicu­lous SMS messages!

# by Josh Street on August 18th, 2004 Tags: , , , , , , , ,
| 3 Comments »