Local galleries fixed

As if this server wasn’t push­ing enough traf­fic per day already (this site is gen­er­ally 100MB/day of what you’ll see on that graph, plus spi­der traf­fic), I finally got around to sit­ting down and fix­ing the bro­ken stuff about the gallery here. Well, okay, Ben did most of the fix­ing. I changed some URI structures/added some rules so that old perma­links start work­ing again. Any­way, point is, all the old stuff is work­ing again now. Not that this prob­a­bly affects many/any of you who read blog stuff, unless you’re feel­ing nos­tal­gic. Shrug :)

I’m now of mixed mind as to where to upload more pho­tos. Flickr is fun + makes edit­ing meta­data eas­ily + I’ve paid for it for a year. But here is sta­ble + I have com­plete con­trol and… blah blah blah… it’s not owned by Yahoo! (yet ;-) err I mean… *cough*)

Ah well. Flickr API’s make it easy to pull data out quick + eas­ily. So con­ceiv­ably it’d be not too hard to write some­thing to “export” to cat-scan. Maybe by this time next year…

# by Josh on May 8th, 2006 Tags: , ,
| No Comments »

A comment on new toys

Has any­one else noticed the poten­tial new gad­gets seem to have for wreak­ing havoc upon a geek work­space? I’m really strug­gling here after the lat­est toy arrived today. Things are un-cool, but supremely gim­micky. Read the rest of this entry »

Extension “Short” story

Hmm.  I just printed out cover pages, two drafts, the final copy, and a com­po­si­tional reflec­tion thinga­ma­jig, and it came to 22 pages total.

Doo bee doo.

So much for 1000 words… *cough*.

Yes, of course my final limit is within the 1100 mark!!  I wouldn’t dream of vio­lat­ing that!  I wouldn’t be so irre­spon­si­ble as to write 1500ish words even on the final edit.

I shall say no more.  ;)

The final copy shall be posted online after I return home tomor­row after­noon, as with­out a doubt, there will be many peo­ple still work­ing on it tonight and tomor­row morn­ing, and mak­ing their life eas­ier would be bor­ing.  Or some­thing.  Plagurism sucks, hehe.

I sup­pose they *did* ask it be dou­ble spaced, so that unnec­ces­sar­ily con­tributed some sig­nif­i­cant bloat to the final doc­u­ment, but still… 22 pages for ~1500 words seems ridicu­lous.  Meh!

# by Josh on June 20th, 2004 Tags:
| 3 Comments »

Chasing tails

I’ve made a vague promise that this would be writ­ten in loose terms, so I’m sorry if I break def­i­n­i­tions of loose, here ;p

The St. Andrews IT depart­ment has long been a cause of angst not only for stu­dents, but for teach­ers, par­ents, and fish.  In the past, there have been var­i­ous peo­ple attempt to hack­saw it down, how­ever they have been detained and gen­er­ally oppressed because of it.

This is a topic scarce-discussed, for fear of reprisals from var­i­ous per­son­nel.  As Ellis Baker would say in “The System” — “Anything but I.T. Levi, any­thing.”  But SC shall brave it, bring­ing you news from the front at great risk to life, limb, and net­work access priv­i­leges.  Well, okay, reduced risk to the for­mer two, and dubi­ous risk to the third.

Don’t inter­rupt my drama­ti­sa­tion, okay?

So, any­way… In the past, such attempts to fell the gar­gan­tuan enter­prise that is SACS IT have been cir­cum­vented (often before the offend­ing par­ties were aware that such attempts had occurred — such is the ben­e­fit of a “first strike” net­work admin pol­icy, it would seem.  Nev­er­mind pre­ven­tion, accu­sa­tion is the cure!) — but now, two brave young men have ende­voured to strike where none have ever (pub­licly) struck before (and got­ten caught for it).

Bob and Bill, as they shall be known, set out on a mis­sion to bypass the *cough* secu­rity mea­sures *end­cough* that St. Andrews had in place, using a vast vari­ety of highly skilled pro­grammes (note: skill rests in pro­grammes) obtained from highly secre­tive and lit­tle known secu­rity resources on some­thing known as the Inter­net.  Big “I”, there.

It is alleged that cer­tain peo­ple obtained access to resources through the use of util­i­ties designed espe­cially to dis­rupt net­work activ­ity within St. Andrews, namely known as Linux, a highly mali­cious tool for Black Hat hack­ers, with known vio­la­tions of global intel­lec­tual prop­erty law.  Clearly, this is a tool only for extreme crim­i­nals on the edge of society.

Specif­i­cally, they are thought to have made use of the dubi­ously named “CISCO TESTING SERVER”, labelled with an equally ques­tion­able mes­sage — “DO NOT TURN OFF”.  This com­puter, thought to have been run­ning a vari­ant of this highly ille­gal “Linux”, was a purpose-built hack­ing tool, with the capac­ity to destroy nations at the press of a but­ton.  Go the direct link to ye olde ICBM launcher on the roof of BBC.

Hey, this is sound­ing more and more like “The Sys­tem” every minute!  Bring on Paint!

[i]If you haven’t read it, talk to Ellis Baker some­time, or talk to me and I’ll email you a copy of it — from what I’ve heard from him, he’d want as many peo­ple to read it as pos­si­ble… hehe, it is a VERY good read.[/i]

Dis­claimer: [i]The infor­ma­tion pre­sented above is not guar­an­teed to con­tain a shred of truth.  For the most part, I have taken a small part real­ity, and dis­torted it beyond imme­di­ate recog­ni­tion.  If any­one is offended by the truth that remains, if you can give me legal rea­son to retract com­ments, then I will.  Until then, post a com­ment, have a cry, and get on with your life.

Oh, and secure your net­works, whilst you’re at it.[/i]