Erasure

many of these things will not last, should not be expected to last. the lack of per­ma­nence is char­ac­ter­is­tic of volatile infor­ma­tion, pre­served only fleet­ingly even at a minus 25 degree boil­ing point.

we for­get.

some­times not soon enough, pain­lessly enough, loudly enough. as though our protest will make it sooner, eas­ier, clearer. clear­ing these clouds to what end? dis­pelling an illu­sion alone? con­cen­trat­ing pre­cip­i­ta­tion at some other time, in some other place? seed­ing rain­fall is an impre­cise sci­ence, you know. bei­jing would like to think oth­er­wise — will have the world think oth­er­wise, but we will have to wait until the eighth hour of the eighth day to learn — or at least observe the cul­mi­na­tion of many fac­tors not totally understood.

our con­trol is at best imprecise.

rumours of tesla weapons and unheeded seis­mol­o­gists and toads are one thing, but the bur­ial of thou­sands and grief to fam­i­lies and sub­se­quent sui­cides and infer­til­i­ties and aban­don­ments are quite another. as, too, are res­cues and out­pour­ings of com­pas­sion and global relief efforts and prayers of thou­sands, at least some of which are being heard.

the oppor­tunists? the profiteers?

“no man has power to retain the spirit, or power over the day of death” (Ecc 8:8) — so let them lie and cheat. let the cheaters lie. they are dig­ging their own pit.

why do good things hap­pen to evil people?

it was not always like this. it will not remain like this.

“he [Jesus of Nazareth] is the one appointed by God to be judge of the liv­ing and the dead” (Acts 10:42)

but he, too, makes us at peace with him through pay­ing the price for us on the cross. “[God] rec­on­ciles to him­self all things, whether on earth or in heaven, mak­ing peace by the blood of his cross.” (Col 1:20)

“Surely I am com­ing soon.” (Rev 22:20)

come, Lord Jesus!

# by Josh on June 3rd, 2008 Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
| No Comments »

Prolific poison

Is it a placebo effect if you don’t remem­ber why the effects are occur­ring? I just glanced at my cal­en­dar for tomor­row after hav­ing briefly gone to bed then got up think­ing I had unread/written emails, spent a while doing that, then real­is­ing it’s 1.15am and I’m not at all tired. Then, think­ing back through the evening and recall­ing that sug­ary black liq­uid was involved at some point.

Clearly, the only option is to become addicted to the stuff. What’s bizarre is that it is avail­able every­where, peo­ple don’t think twice about con­sum­ing or offer­ing it, and yet (for me at least) it has greater imme­di­ate con­se­quences than smok­ing tobacco (bad smell aside). I will be a wreck by tomor­row evening.

I’ve already started the week inex­plic­a­bly exhausted (I have been sleep­ing more sensibly/normally the last few days/week than I have been for the last month) with­out the involve­ment of caf­feine, and for­tu­nately have had time enough to respond to that exhaus­tion (I had 14 hours sleep last night) with lit­tle impact to my sched­uled com­mit­ments, but I still drank most of a bot­tle of this stuff with­out think­ing. And I’m not at all phys­i­cally ill, with the excep­tion of some­thing that looked like a very slight cold late last week. I have no rea­son to be tired (and, con­versely, no rea­son to be this awake with the excep­tion of that stuff).

Any­way… I’m now going to try and go sleep a while. Dream­ing of peo­ple who aren’t projects, and Christ as a judge, as well as a sav­iour who takes the pun­ish­ment deserved by men, Mac­beth and dark per­for­mance on a day­light stage, and inex­plic­a­bly out-of-sync databases.

# by Josh on March 14th, 2007 Tags:
| 4 Comments »

The Penelopiad, Chapter 26: Trial of Odysseus as Videotaped by the Maids

Essay, ENGL1002.

Screenshot of PDF front page

Full­text fol­lows, incor­rect for­mat­ting. PDF ver­sion also avail­able (proper for­mat­ting, foot­notes, etc.).

Read the rest of this entry »

Da Vinci Copyright: sense prevails

“It would be quite wrong if fic­tional writ­ers were to have their writ­ings pored over in the way DVC ( ‘Da Vinci Code’) has been pored over in this case by authors of pre­tend his­tor­i­cal books to make an alle­ga­tion of infringe­ment of copy­right,” Judge Peter Smith said in his 71-page ruling.

“Cases like this hope­fully will clar­ify what copy­right is all about,” said Allan Adler, vice pres­i­dent for legal and gov­ern­ment affairs at the Asso­ci­a­tion of Amer­i­can Publishers.

“Copy­right doesn’t pro­tect ideas and copy­right doesn’t pro­tect facts. That’s why we have gen­res, fic­tion and non­fic­tion, and a num­ber of peo­ple can write nov­els based on the same idea and still have free­dom of expression.”

– Asso­ci­ated Press

There is no own­er­ship of ideas. Com­mon sense calls for attri­bu­tion (which DVC gave any­way!), but an idea is ephemeral in the mind of one per­son alone: growth beyond that is required for it to sur­vive. If ideas are of value (one pre­sumes that they are), any notion of exclu­siv­ity is ludi­crous and devaluing.

I am not, there­fore, an irra­tional com­mu­nist in this regard. I acknowl­edge value, but sim­ply reject that same value is decreased by propagation/increase in supply/availability. Hence, I am an irra­tional capitalist.