Acrobat tip: Set Page Display in PDF files

Have you ever won­dered how to make your PDF files open in a par­tic­u­lar page dis­play lay­out? Sent a PDF of a book­let or mag­a­zine to some­one and won­dered how to make the title appear on its own page?

The “Ini­tial View” set­ting in Adobe Acro­bat is the answer. Sim­ply open Doc­u­ment Prop­er­ties (Ctrl+D on Win­dows, or ⌘+D in OS X) and click onto the “Ini­tial View” tab. Here, you can set the ini­tial page dis­play for­mat, open­ing page, zoom lev­els, and even what the title of the win­dow is.

Acrobat Initial View Document Properties

When you’re done, just close the Doc­u­ment Prop­er­ties win­dow and save your file. Easy!

Outlook 2007 again…

I’ve been doing the low-bandwidth mobile thing for the past two months due to travel and had accord­ingly been reserv­ing judg­ment JUST IN CASE that had any­thing at all to do with it. But it really doesn’t. Out­look 2007 is an absolute loser of a prod­uct. No other soft­ware on my com­puter is as vis­i­bly frus­trat­ing or unsta­ble. It’s being used with three POP accounts (all mostly well behaved) and one IMAP store (unmit­i­gated dis­as­ter) that work fine with other clients. This shouldn’t be so hard to get right. I don’t like hav­ing to use web­mail, though at least it’s very good webmail.

These are the sort of nig­gly prob­lems that make OS X look appeal­ing… Mail.app is inte­grated with OS search and all that other stuff so nicely. Cal­en­dars and Con­tacts are no longer com­pellingly bet­ter on Out­look than else­where. In fact, between Sony Eric­s­son and Microsoft, var­i­ous con­tacts in my phone man­aged to get junked because of char­ac­ter encod­ing issues — even when using a lan­guage installed on both phone and sync computer.

Email is a freakin’ ancient tech. Why can’t this just be straight­for­ward, Microsoft?

# by Josh on August 21st, 2008 Tags: , , , , , ,
| 2 Comments »

No Vista before SP

Appar­ently I’m not the only one think­ing this way about Vista. Though it looks awful pretty, and if I bought a PC with it installed I’d prob­a­bly have a hard time con­vinc­ing myself to buy another XP license just so I didn’t have to use Vista for a few months! On the flip side, I would def­i­nitely con­sider hold­ing off a hard­ware pur­chase that included a Vista license for a few more months, know­ing a Ser­vice Pack is imminent.

Of course, if they’d got it right from the start, I’d be run­ning Vista already… as it stands, I’m not too likely to drop $200 on some­thing that runs slower than XP, sup­ports less hard­ware, has arguably-worse power man­age­ment, and makes the occa­sion­ally excru­ci­at­ing UI mis­take (most notable is the auto­matic replace­ment of the “sleep” but­ton with “install updates and shut­down” where updates are avail­able). Really, the main rea­son I’d switch is to have con­sis­tent UI between Office 2007 and the rest of the sys­tem (instead of the presently absurd Vista-ish (but not actu­ally Vista) UI avail­able on XP), newer hard­ware (inso­far as XP isn’t avail­able), and a paid-for upgrade path… I’d rather fork out my money now and trust that another 3 ser­vice packs are com­ing, rather than pay full price for an OS and then pay full price again, and again. I acknowl­edge this is par­tially a psy­cho­log­i­cal thing stem­ming from my oppo­si­tion for pay­ing for point-releases, but even so… many of the alleged ‘upgrades’ in OS X are thor­oughly trivial.

Windows language handling sucks

The lan­guage bar will ran­domly change lan­guages, and ran­domly dis­ap­pear, and because it’s han­dled at an application-specific level (admit­tedly a largely sen­si­ble deci­sion) this means restart­ing appli­ca­tions just to change the lan­guage. This pisses me off immensely. Almost to the point of “if Vista did it bet­ter I’d con­sider switch­ing”, and I don’t even have that much to do with lan­guages other than english.

I’ve not used this much on any­one else’s sys­tem, but haven’t done any­thing par­tic­u­larly crazy with it and it still sucks… soooo… I blame Win­dows. I’m almost cer­tain main­stream Linux dis­tros can han­dle this bet­ter, but know noth­ing about how OS X deals with it… shrug.

# by Josh on May 19th, 2007 Tags: , , ,
| 2 Comments »

OS X version naming absurdity

Ear­lier this evening:

Claud… (6:08 PM):
i need mac OS X 10.4.8
josh.st (6:08 PM):
and have 10.4?
Claud… (6:08 PM):
no idea!
josh.st (6:09 PM):
leop­ard?
Claud… (6:09 PM):
no flip­pin idea
josh.st (6:10 PM):
pan­ther?
josh.st (6:10 PM):
tiger
josh.st (6:10 PM):
?
josh.st (6:10 PM):
some­thing with spots?
Claud… (6:10 PM):
OMGOSH!! STOP WITH THE ANIMALS! why!!

I had no answer why.

# by Josh on February 14th, 2007 Tags:
| 2 Comments »

Photoshop/Firefox 1.0.x and the case of the mystery line

Photoshop version
GIMP version

This is a rather bizarre prob­lem affect­ing Fire­fox 1.0.x on Mac OS X and Win­dows, but not Linux. Even IE escapes unscathed (well, as unscathed as it ever does when using PNG graph­ics. That is to say, rel­a­tively fine when using fil­ter: properties).

Load up this post in Fire­fox 1.0.x (not on Linux) and note the dif­fer­ence between the two graph­ics above. There is a 1-pixel yel­low hor­i­zon­tal line along the bot­tom of the first image (gen­er­ated by Pho­to­shop). The sec­ond image — near iden­ti­cal — should not bear any such mark.

The 1-pixel trans­parency (yel­low is a back­ground colour set using CSS) is not in the source file in Pho­to­shop, and does not dis­play in any other browser, includ­ing Fire­fox 1.5/Flock. The GIMP ver­sion was made by open­ing the graphic, smudg­ing an all-white area (i.e. white-to-white, so it recog­nised the file had changed but was visu­ally iden­ti­cal), and re-saving.

On a hunch that Pho­to­shop was a hor­ri­ble, hor­ri­ble mon­ster. I was right!

So, my ques­tion to the world: did I do some­thing wrong in Pho­to­shop? Has any­one seen this behav­iour before? What’s going on?!

*goes slowly insane*

# by Josh on January 4th, 2006 Tags: , ,
| 4 Comments »

HP Photosmart 2610 review

Our new printer/scanner thingy arrived today, which is, as the title sug­gests, an HP Pho­to­s­mart 2610. We lease our print­ers, so the Office­jet G85 is going away *sniff*, but this thing promises new and bet­ter things! (Even if some of the soft­ware sucks — I’ll get to that, later.)

A photo of the printer

You can see the printer in that photo — it’s a fair bit smaller than the G85 was (before you go search­ing — because I know you actu­ally care that much — I’ve only ever fleet­ingly men­tioned that printer on here before. A quick search just turns up a whinge about dri­vers, from last July.), prob­a­bly between two thirds and a half its size (in terms of bulk — it has an equiv­a­lent foot­print, or maybe a bit shallower).

So what’s this thing do? Print­ing, scan­ning, fax­ing. Duh. It also has Pict­Bridge stuff (which I doubt I’ll ever use), mem­ory card slots, an LCD dis­play, and net­work support.

I’m still uncer­tain which of the last two is cooler, but I’m lean­ing towards the net­work support.

The main con­trol panel is very well planned out, and highly usable.

The main panel

The LCD screen tilts back­wards and for­wards (into a recessed area within the printer), and is backlit.

The LCD display

Its view­ing angle is pretty mediocre, but it’s good when you’ve got your head in the right place/adjusted the screen properly.

Now that I’ve got the triv­ial stuff out of the way with lots of pic­tures, time for some more excit­ing and slightly-less triv­ial stuff with even more pic­tures! The net­work feature!

A plugged in network port

Yeah, okay. We’ve all seen a plugged in net­work cable before. Prob­a­bly even seen a net­work cable plugged into a printer before. So why’s this spe­cial? To quote Eliz­a­beth Bar­rett Brown­ing, “Let me count the ways” — okay, so I’m not quite in love with it. (Thank goodness).

For one, this is a dirt cheap con­sumer printer. Well, prob­a­bly a lit­tle more than dirt cheap. But squarely in the home/SOHO mar­ket, so the net­work sup­port (it does USB, too) is out of the ordinary.

Not only is the pres­ence of a port out of the ordi­nary, the soft­ware side of things is also sur­pris­ing. HP, of course, have their own “Jet­Di­rect” net­work printer pro­to­col. Which isn’t IPP, and isn’t some crappy Win­dows share. It’s sup­ported on Unix sys­tems thanks to HP’s co-operation with the open-source com­mu­nity, and on Windows/Mac sys­tems, HP bun­dle soft­ware to deliver this functionality.

Still noth­ing spe­cial? Okay. How about this.

You can not only use this net­work printer to print, but also to file share and net­work scan.

Yeah. Cool, huh? When­ever you plug a card into the mem­ory slots, it will appear as a net­work drive on Win­dows sys­tems with the HP soft­ware installed (with one caveat, but I’ll get to that soon). I’m not sure what hap­pens with Mac com­put­ers, but I imag­ine it’d be sim­i­lar — we haven’t got any of those here for me to test with, a sit­u­a­tion I’m plan­ning to rem­edy in the near future.

Whilst on the topic of those mem­ory slots, it’s also pos­si­ble to scan on the device direct to the card, so you don’t even need a com­puter with dri­vers for scan­ning. Also, much in the same way as many con­sumer scan­ners have a but­ton you can press to acti­vate scan­ning on your com­puter, this device sim­i­larly allows you to do that — only you’re given a choice of which network-connected com­puter to send the scan to!

Scan­ning needn’t be so com­pli­cated, how­ever. The first thing I did after installing car­tridges was to setup the net­work inte­face man­u­ally to ensure the device had a sta­tic IP and couldn’t get lost on the net­work. In my usual com­pul­sive geek-investigator state, I scanned the ports of that IP (I picked 192.168.0.4, the low­est sta­tic IP still avail­able on my net­work — we also use 192.168.0.101 to 200 for DHCP, but that’s a story for some other time) and dis­cov­ered that in addi­tion to the Jet­Di­rect and Win­dows file shar­ing ports, there was also port 80 open.

Score! I thought, as I hadn’t expected any­thing so civilised as a web inter­face on this thing.

I loaded up the page, and was greeted with this:

A screenshot of the web interface

It gives mis­cel­la­neous infor­ma­tion about the sta­tus of the printer, along with links to var­i­ous other func­tions. The most impor­tant of which is “Scan”.

Click­ing through to “Scan”, I’m greeted with a sim­ple enough screen that offers a choice of image type, and doc­u­ment size. One thing that does suck here is that A4 isn’t an option for the doc­u­ment size, so it’s impos­si­ble to scan the full size of the plate with the web inter­face. Stan­dard desk­top scan­ning soft­ware has no prob­lems, this is just a usabil­ity flaw in the web interface.

You can pre­view your scan in this page, as shown in this screenshot…

Screenshot of preview scan page

…before pro­gress­ing to the actual scan.

This next bit had me con­fused. At first, I thought it just didn’t like Fire­fox — so I walked over to a Win­dows com­puter and gave Inter­net Explorer a go. Same prob­lem. It said the scan had com­pleted suc­cess­fully, but I couldn’t see any­thing. Inter­net Explorer, how­ever, offered a more intru­sive expla­na­tion of what had hap­pened, proudly pro­claim­ing that it had blocked a popup window.

So, back to Fire­fox, I added 192.168.0.4 to the list of allowed popup sites, and all was merry.

The expe­ri­ence has been a mostly pos­i­tive one, with one excep­tion. Their Win­dows XP soft­ware sucks. That needs some qual­i­fi­ca­tion — it only sucks if you’re using it in an envi­ron­ment that has been admin­is­tered cor­rectly. If you’re Joe-my-computer-is-full-of-spyware-from-running-as-administrator-Smith, then you’re in luck (for once): it’ll work fine. But, if you’ve setup user accounts (as could be expected, even in a small net­work envi­ron­ment) that aren’t run­ning as Admin­is­tra­tor (even the Power User group doesn’t work), then you can’t print or scan or read the con­tents of flash disks in the printer.

As I write, there is no known solu­tion to the prob­lem, and what I’ve read would sug­gest that HP are deny­ing such a prob­lem exists. Well, it does, and it isn’t solely because of inept administration.

In all, a good device marred by a few soft­ware flaws. If you’re look­ing for a net­work printer for a non-XP envi­ron­ment, be that ear­lier ver­sions of Win­dows or Mac OS X or a *nix envi­ron­ment, I’d say it’s a great buy. Bonuses are the abil­ity to use the flash card reader on all con­nected com­put­ers, net­work scan­ning, and an LCD pre­view display.

In terms of print qual­ity, the colours are okay, though key (black) isn’t won­der­ful. I’ve only tested on 60GSM paper, though, so that’s obvi­ously a con­tribut­ing fac­tor in my judge­ment. I doubt the qual­ity would be of con­cern to most users, at any rate. It’s more than ade­quate for most desk­top tasks.