Mosquitoes

The most frus­trat­ing thing in the world is know­ing that you have sev­eral bites from a sin­gle mos­quito, think­ing that it’s prob­a­bly going to die because it’s had too much to drink — revenge!! –, and then real­is­ing its pain will be over as its stom­ach explodes, prob­a­bly with­out it even real­is­ing — do mos­qui­toes have brains? — whilst you will have to live with the itches for the next sev­eral days. Ah, summer.

# by Josh Street on December 24th, 2005 Tags:
| No Comments »

November 10, 2005

Ah, would you look at that date? Yes, indeed, this fabled “Other Side” is indeed real. Or maybe I’m now a fig­ment of my own imag­i­na­tion and I still have exams to go. Whoa, recursive.

Busi­ness was good, but for one ques­tion, the details of which I don’t exactly recall (23 c), which was so poorly writ­ten only BS teach­ers could man­age it. It depresses me to think there are peo­ple that can spend that much of their life pro­fes­sion­ally apply­ing buzz­words and doing absolutely noth­ing. Your mother was a hamp­ster and your father smelt of elder­ber­ries! Now go away, or I shall taunt you a sec­ond time!

And they did. The won­ders of Monty Python!

So, today, I plan to spend some time doing stuff with Tori because she’s about to fly away for… a long time… and then when I get home/before I go out play with Cinel­erra, which, mirac­u­lously, I finally have work­ing well. The secret is to ignore the stu­pid DEB and go straight for the RPMs with alien, which makes the expe­ri­ence remark­ably pain­less. Err… in a totally non-abducted-by-aliens kind of way.

ANYWAY! My biggest qualm with it is its render/batch ren­der thing, not because it’s slow (it is, kind of, but that’s mostly just the way I’ve got this com­puter setup), but because it seems impos­si­ble to export in a for­mat that every­thing likes (aside from straight raw DV, which I haven’t tried because I need to put another hard disk in this com­puter. I would have, but I’m out of IDE chan­nels and really need to think about how to store things properly.)

At the minute, I’m gen­er­ally ren­der­ing in MPEG-4 (ffm­peg) and then effec­tively transcod­ing back to MPEG-4 using mplayer to make it more player-friendly. I take it the codec is exactly the same, it’s just that Cinel­erra seems to have some quirk that means only mplayer can read the ren­dered file, whilst xine and VLC fall over and promptly die.

Shrug. I’ve just been edit­ing video sequences, though, so at least I haven’t had to deal with audio as well. One would pre­sume that would be rather less pain­less — it’s not, at least not in terms of set­ting up Cinel­erra for audio playback/NLE stuff. Despite hav­ing both ALSA and esound out­put options, ALSA would just make it crash (this seems widely doc­u­mented with no fix avail­able), and esound wouldn’t work because… well… I don’t think my local esound server has a port open, and Cinel­erra, being some broadcast-quality high-and-mighty piece of crap, decides that talk­ing to a local sound server is beneath it. Iron­i­cally, the sim­plest of the lot, OSS, worked with­out any dif­fi­cul­ties… but that of course means I can only have one sound stream going simul­ta­ne­ously. Which, admit­tedly, isn’t a huge prob­lem when you’re try­ing to work in Cinel­erra (it’s hardly as though you want other sounds going on whilst you’re try­ing to edit audio), but dis­abling the server, etc, can be a lit­tle bit of a pain.

# by Josh Street on November 10th, 2005 Tags: , , , ,
| No Comments »

Kodak HD

High def­i­n­i­tion? Huge dis­as­ter? Hor­ri­ble dis­ap­point­ment? Heinously difficult?

Photo of a roll of Kodak HD film

I went to buy a three-pack of 24 expo­sure 35mm film for my SP 500 today, and, because it was on spe­cial (prob­a­bly because the film expires next month), treated myself to Kodak’s over-marketed offer­ing that I’ve always been a lit­tle dubi­ous about. Dis­claimer at this point — I don’t think there’s any­thing tech­ni­cally wrong with the film by any stretch of the imag­i­na­tion. I’m sure it’ll pro­duce great shots. But the brand­ing and mar­ket­ing of this doesn’t exactly assist the pho­tog­ra­pher (I so nearly wrote “end user” there — must get out more.) in cap­tur­ing great shots, at least not in terms of exposure.

To explain: this film is billed as being multi-purpose. It does every­thing. Appar­ently. It also does it well. Apparently.

Okay, noth­ing wrong with that. You could use good qual­ity ISO100 stock to do “every­thing”, albeit with a lit­tle bit of pain. By the same token, this film stock does “every­thing”. It’d just help if I’d known what I was using before I got home and had time to look up the specs online.

The bot­tom line is this: on the exte­rior pack­ag­ing there is absolutely no men­tion of the speed of the film enclosed, aside from fleet­ing com­par­isons to other Kodak prod­ucts, say­ing “look, this is bet­ter, it does more stuff” — never mind that if you inspect closely it’s actu­ally slightly dif­fer­ent stuff. Decep­tive mar­ket­ing cer­tainly plays a part in the problem.

So, I couldn’t find infor­ma­tion about that any­where on the pack­ag­ing. I loaded it into my cam­era and ran off a roll of it, with the ISO speed set to 400 (that’s some­thing I’d per­son­ally con­sider fairly use­ful, if not overly ver­sa­tile — cer­tainly some­thing I’d con­sider prob­a­ble if they’re mar­ket­ing a con­sumer brand high-quality stock), try­ing not to worry too much about it.

Adjusting exposure and ASA (ISO) speed assigned

Yeah, a recipe for disaster.

I got home, checked Kodak’s specs, and it turns out the film was ISO/ASA/DIN/whatever you want to call it 200 speed film. Noth­ing I can do about it now, of course, apart from hope that post-processing will be able to clean up the under­ex­posed mess. I went and had a closer look at the car­tridge after I’d thought about it for a bit, and it does say the speed on the side of it — but of course, I didn’t think to check this until I’d already wound the film on, so even had I thought of it at the time it wasn’t the best option.

Why can’t film man­u­fac­tur­ers label their prod­ucts more thor­oughly and cut down on over­hyped mar­ket­ing that fails to actu­ally inform the con­sumer of what their prod­uct is?

Our new-old TV

We’ve finally bought a TV capa­ble of hav­ing RCA cables plugged directly into it! Sure, it’s sec­ond hand, con­ven­tional (i.e. not flat) CRT and a Sanyo, but it’s 51cm and means we don’t need to use a 19″ BenQ LCD bizarrely wired directly to our DVD player which has a VGA out­put (nearly exactly half the LCD’s native res­o­lu­tion, which is handy, but it’s a pain to lug from the office to the liv­ing room every time we wanna watch a DVD!).

So that’s excit­ing. I’d post pic­tures, but just imag­ine any generic curvy CRT TV and you’ve got the right idea. ;) It wasn’t really worth the time it’d take to find the cam­era, take a photo, come upstairs, upload photo, resize photo, login and upload via FTP, and then fig­ure out the path to the file for inclu­sion in this post!

It also has won­der­ful won­der­ful mono sound, but that’s okay, because we’ve got a nice Sony sys­tem hooked up for that… at least the audio side of things is pretty good qual­ity, even if the vision is func­tional but far from excel­lent (Infi­nitely bet­ter than the 20-or-30-something year old set we used to use as the main TV, though!)…

Later: As a direct result of the won­ders of pro­cras­ti­na­tion, I ven­tured down­stairs with a cam­era and took a photo of a per­fectly bor­ing TV.

A perfectly boring TV.

There you go.

# by Josh Street on March 1st, 2005 Tags: , , , , ,
| 1 Comment »

PCMCIA network cards

Don’t sup­pose any­one has one lying around that they want to sell, or knows where to get them cheaply? Wired eth­er­net or wire­less 802.11b (or c,d,e,f,g,…x,y,z — whatever’s in flavour this month), I’m pretty indif­fer­ent. My Xir­com eth­er­net card has gone walkies (I have absolutely NO idea where it is… that isn’t some­thing I’d have packed, either), and I want con­nec­tiv­ity on my laptop.

The USB drive has gone some way to alle­vi­at­ing the pain, but still, it’s not as good as direct access to my net­work, espe­cially in terms of live edit­ing of remote sites… not that I’d ever do such a thing! Best prac­tice be damned. ;-)

Yes… if any­one has one they want to lend/sell (even if it’s only 10Mbit, that’s fine), then get in touch via the con­tact form, or just email me.

# by Josh Street on November 8th, 2004 Tags: ,
| 5 Comments »

The Wife not Discovered

An… inter­est­ing poem, com­posed in Eng­lish by Louis, Kris­ten and Tori. Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh Street on November 1st, 2004 Tags: , , , ,
| N/A

Non-techie stuff

Just to make me feel bet­ter about con­tent bal­ance on this web­site before I go to sleep. Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh Street on October 11th, 2004 Tags:
| N/A