A new theme: SC 500

A screenshot of the new theme
I’m just post­ing so that the RSS mob realises some­thing has indeed changed. ;) Yeah, that was a joke. Kind of. Not a dis­cus­sion for now, any­way. The theme is built around my film SLR cam­era, a Pen­tax Asahi SP 500. Vaguely inspired by Dale’s somewhat-cynical com­ment a few days back, although more out of a knowl­edge that I really should stop being lazy and build my own theme, and a gen­eral re-design itch, I whipped this up over the course of today.

I shot a range of pho­tos of the SLR cam­era to use as a design base, and even­tu­ally wound up chos­ing one as the main design ele­ment, crop­ping off part of another to inte­grate within that after some edit­ing (that’s the “SC 500″ and ser­ial num­ber you see burnt onto the front of the lens bevel), and scal­ing one down to use as a back­ground for the search area.

The search area, inci­den­tally, is inspired by a post of Matthom’s a few months back enti­tled “Attrac­tive, acces­si­ble web forms.” The image I’ve used is one of the length of the lense — the the­ory behind this being that the pur­pose of a search func­tion, as with the lense on a cam­era, is to focus and zoom — one being images, and the other, information.

I’m think­ing the typog­ra­phy doesn’t feel ter­ri­bly inspired, but I can deal with that given its clar­ity. The colours of the post header type, by the way, have noth­ing to do with Flickr — the link and link hover colours used to be more pink and more light blue before I noticed how sim­i­lar it looked to Flickr’s brand­ing! I’ve shifted it down a bit, but I thought I’d clar­ify now that any resem­b­lence is purely inci­den­tal, before some­one else said anything.

I haven’t decided if the header is cool or annoy­ing yet. I wanted it to be appar­ently com­plex, ide­ally with­out need­ing to use images, but I don’t know if this is tak­ing things a lit­tle too far — hover back and for­wards too quickly and it is a con­fus­ing expe­ri­ence. The inter­face can be sim­pli­fied eas­ily, but I thought I’d ask for feed­back on the weird/trippy ver­sion first.

Changes in summary

  • IMO cleaner markup than Placid (the pre­vi­ously used theme by Chris Lin)
  • Also lighter (band­width wise). This theme is a 58KB tem­plate, Placid was 130KB. Par­tially code/markup, but largely images. Reduced use of images in this tem­plate will also reduce hits and thus improve load­ing times.
  • Opti­mised for wider screens: fluid lay­out, works best from 1024 upwards. Moti­vated at least in part by my own acqui­si­tion of more screen real estate recently
  • Built for Word­Press 1.5 from the ground up — the first theme I’ve devel­oped myself for this web­site that’s had that advantage
  • Inclu­sion of a “Recent Com­ments” section
  • 3 col­umn lay­out using absolute positioning
  • “Bright” design, because I’ve been accused of always com­ing up with darker colour schemes, etc.

Digital made me dumb

The last two nights I’ve used my Pen­tax SP500 (film SLR) cam­era, and I’m more than a tad annoyed at myself. Less so tonight than yes­ter­day, but there we go — either way, it’s not good. I hadn’t really used the film cam­era since about Jan­u­ary this year (I know, it’s appalling; more as a result of time than desire, how­ever, as I haven’t had many planned oppor­tu­ni­ties for good pho­tog­ra­phy ses­sions), so this was the first time I’d really used it since get­ting the dig­i­tal toy (because, really, despite the opti­cal zoom, that’s all it is).

It’s cre­ated three major prob­lems, in terms of my pho­tog­ra­phy skills. Firstly, I’m snap-happy. It’s ridicu­lous (ridicu­lously expen­sive!). Last night I went through a roll of 35mm film in one per­for­mance (didn’t cover the whole show, either), and tonight, when I was try­ing to cover the bit I missed, I went through another roll in under 15 min­utes. Yeeaaahhhh.

That’s not so much a tech­ni­cal issue as a styl­is­tic one, how­ever. Far more impor­tantly, I quite lit­er­ally for­got that adjustable F-stop rings existed. Need­less to say, when I remem­bered, I kicked myself rather hard. Stupidity++.

I’d also for­got­ten to use the spot meter until about halfway through the night (and, hon­estly, it’s pretty use­ful to have! Com­plain all you want about how they’re inac­cu­rate and don’t tru­ely mea­sure what they’re see­ing, but it’s a great ref­er­ence point — I’m not say­ing fol­low them blindly, but they cer­tainly help), which prob­a­bly resulted in a whole num­ber of too-dark pho­tos (or too-unneccesarily-blurry pho­tos — the shut­ter was set to quar­ter sec­ond expo­sure for most of the night!)

Speak­ing of enor­mous expo­sures, I’m really lov­ing hav­ing a CHUNKY cam­era to hold again. Don’t get me wrong, I love my tiny Optio (it fits in my pocket per­fectly), but not for night pho­tog­ra­phy sans flash. It’s just too small to hold steadily, unless you’re braced against some­thing incred­i­bly solid, or you get lucky with the sub­ject mov­ing as your hand does (cool focused sub­ject with blurred back­ground — noth­ing to do with depth of field, just motion). The SP500, how­ever… drool. I haven’t had time to get these two rolls put in for devel­op­ing yet, but it just feels good to use. Ridicu­lously good. It’s like mov­ing from a dis­pos­able cam­era, almost (a GOOD dis­pos­able cam­era, but still).

This is why when I got the dig­i­tal I tried to con­vince myself I’d never use it for any­thing seri­ous — because I fully recog­nise it’s a dinky lit­tle toy. It exists to be taken nearly every­where, to cap­ture any­thing, just for kicks. Like this police car, for example…

Wide shot of a Smart car with police markings
Close up of Smart logo and police markings

# by Josh on March 11th, 2005 Tags: , ,
| 1 Comment »

Neglected to mention…

… that my par­ents got me a dig­i­tal cam­era for the birth­day a few days back. It’s a Pen­tax Optio S40, has a 4MP sen­sor, 3x opti­cal zoom (and some dig­i­tal which I’ve of course dis­abled), a flash, 11MB inbuilt mem­ory (I pre­sume THAT means that there’s 16MB, 5MB of which is soft­ware stuff) and another 256MB SD card which we bought.

Every photo posted here from The Lazy Kings til now has been taken with that cam­era… yeah, I was using it before my birth­day, bad me :P

I main­tain that the other Pen­tax (SP 500 film SLR) takes bet­ter pic­tures, espe­cially at night, but it’s just so much more expen­sive to use all the time! Hav­ing said that, I’m not going to let it sink into a cup­board and dis­ap­pear: It’ll be on hand when­ever i’m plan­ning to take (good) pho­tos, whilst the new Pen­tax will be for gen­eral happy snaps and the like.

Qualms with the cam­era thus far? It didn’t come with a rechar­gable bat­tery. $90 later, and I’ve got a Sam­sung charger with killer bat­tery life, so that’s no longer a prob­lem — but it’s an expense that should be noted prior to pur­chase. Other than that, I haven’t fig­ured out how to man­u­ally adjust expo­sure, so if you’re tak­ing pho­tos at night with­out a flash (scenic shots, etc.) then it’s not a great idea. Hav­ing said that, the masssssss­si­i­i­iveee expo­sure in “Night” mode does do some cool blurry things to photos…

Standing on Coogee's North head, looking WSW towards the main beach and lights. January 19, 2005.

View of the Sydney Harbour Bridge from the Opera House, with lights from NYE 2005 still on display. January 17, 2005, with Tori.

The expo­sure time (accord­ing to the EXIF data) on the Har­bour Bridge image is 4 sec­onds, and 1 sec­ond on the first shot (Coogee) — but it felt like lots more, because it was really windy stand­ing on the head. (No, not stand­ing on my head… that would be talent!)

The City, Zetland and friends.

I just uploaded (as in, about 20 min­utes ago) a new roll of film to the pho­tog­ra­phy sec­tion, as an album enti­tled “The City, Zet­land and friends”. Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh on October 27th, 2004 Tags: ,
| 1 Comment »

Missing day

It’s not really Fri­day. The gap in post­ing you see shouldn’t be there, because as far as I’m con­cerned, it still feels as though it were Thurs­day. That has to be one of the most com­pelling rea­sons not to stay up all night: sim­ply because you don’t ade­quately recog­nise the pass­ing of a day, and every­thing is thrown out com­pletely! Read the rest of this entry »

# by Josh on October 8th, 2004 Tags: , , , , , ,
| N/A