Facebook new interface?

Face­book went out for my user, and after a bit of snoop­ing around I found this…

Screenshot of Facebook's new June 2008 interface

Com­ing soon?

# by Josh on June 20th, 2008 Tags: , , ,
| 2 Comments »

OpenOffice Calc and Base suck

I recog­nise this post is highly ironic in light of yesterday’s remarks about my not being able to use a spread­sheet in par­ody of Apple’s Mac/PC ads, but, please, let it slide.

So all I want is an enum field. Or a mul­ti­ple choice box, easy to get in Excel.

Nei­ther of these are avail­able at time of writ­ing. The term “enum” has only been men­tioned on any OO.o mail­ing lists per­tain­ing to Base nine times, ever. And it sup­pos­edly con­nects to a MySQL server. Yeah, right.

I guess it’s back to rapid pro­to­typ­ing of a web inter­face to deal with data entry, or using Excel/Access… sigh. This was meant to be the quick and easy (and open source) solution.

# by Josh on December 7th, 2006 Tags: ,
| 2 Comments »

Zimbra kicks some butt by abandoning Web 2.0

I was sure I’d blogged about this open-source AJAX email plat­form thingy in the past, but appar­ently not. No mat­ter. They used to be all about their AJAXy web inter­face (my impres­sion, as is always the case here) but now seem to have dropped that and are run­ning along the open-source-for-corporates track that seems to work so well these days. Check­ing out their key cus­tomers and tech­nol­ogy part­ners would sug­gest they’re def­i­nitely doing some­thing right, and it’s beyond the shini­ness of their website.

Mod­est gra­di­ents, no shad­ows, occa­sional (even rare) curves (logo excepted, but I think the logo sucks/is child­ish so what­ever), and tables for layout.

Oh, wait…

# by Josh on October 12th, 2006 Tags: , ,
| No Comments »

Literally lost

<erno> hm. I’ve lost a machine.. lit­er­ally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works com­pletely, I just can’t fig­ure out where in my apart­ment it is.

I always thought that bash.org quote was fab­ri­cated until just now. I lit­er­ally lost my router. It was respond­ing to ping, it worked com­pletely (I was using the web inte­face), but I had no idea where it was. I looked in the usual place and it was gone!

So I rebooted my cable modem instead (the Big­Pond con­nec­tion was “there”, just not work­ing. Hap­pens once every month or two.), went to the web inter­face and recon­nected, and all was good.

I think it might have fallen some­where under­neath our Com­man­der PBX, but I’d need to move a not-insubstantial desk full of cables and var­i­ous IT gear, and risk dis­con­nect­ing some of the 12 or so net­work con­nected devices, in order to see it for sure. Mean­while, it’s out of sight and work­ing perfectly!

Work­ing per­fectly, that is, as a basic Inter­net gate­way. If we were using its hor­ri­ble unse­cur­able (you can do MAC based auth, but only if you’re pre­pared to enter the MAC addresses of LAN devices, too. I’m not. It’s also impos­si­ble just to grant wire­less Inter­net access and block off the LAN — I’d be per­fectly happy leav­ing the AP wide open if I could do that, because band­width should be free. Yeah, what­ever, I’m a ‘net com­mie.) wire­less, I imag­ine recep­tion would be rather poor in that RFI nest! (Assum­ing it’s where I think it is)

HP Photosmart 2610 review

Our new printer/scanner thingy arrived today, which is, as the title sug­gests, an HP Pho­to­s­mart 2610. We lease our print­ers, so the Office­jet G85 is going away *sniff*, but this thing promises new and bet­ter things! (Even if some of the soft­ware sucks — I’ll get to that, later.)

A photo of the printer

You can see the printer in that photo — it’s a fair bit smaller than the G85 was (before you go search­ing — because I know you actu­ally care that much — I’ve only ever fleet­ingly men­tioned that printer on here before. A quick search just turns up a whinge about dri­vers, from last July.), prob­a­bly between two thirds and a half its size (in terms of bulk — it has an equiv­a­lent foot­print, or maybe a bit shallower).

So what’s this thing do? Print­ing, scan­ning, fax­ing. Duh. It also has Pict­Bridge stuff (which I doubt I’ll ever use), mem­ory card slots, an LCD dis­play, and net­work support.

I’m still uncer­tain which of the last two is cooler, but I’m lean­ing towards the net­work support.

The main con­trol panel is very well planned out, and highly usable.

The main panel

The LCD screen tilts back­wards and for­wards (into a recessed area within the printer), and is backlit.

The LCD display

Its view­ing angle is pretty mediocre, but it’s good when you’ve got your head in the right place/adjusted the screen properly.

Now that I’ve got the triv­ial stuff out of the way with lots of pic­tures, time for some more excit­ing and slightly-less triv­ial stuff with even more pic­tures! The net­work feature!

A plugged in network port

Yeah, okay. We’ve all seen a plugged in net­work cable before. Prob­a­bly even seen a net­work cable plugged into a printer before. So why’s this spe­cial? To quote Eliz­a­beth Bar­rett Brown­ing, “Let me count the ways” — okay, so I’m not quite in love with it. (Thank goodness).

For one, this is a dirt cheap con­sumer printer. Well, prob­a­bly a lit­tle more than dirt cheap. But squarely in the home/SOHO mar­ket, so the net­work sup­port (it does USB, too) is out of the ordinary.

Not only is the pres­ence of a port out of the ordi­nary, the soft­ware side of things is also sur­pris­ing. HP, of course, have their own “Jet­Di­rect” net­work printer pro­to­col. Which isn’t IPP, and isn’t some crappy Win­dows share. It’s sup­ported on Unix sys­tems thanks to HP’s co-operation with the open-source com­mu­nity, and on Windows/Mac sys­tems, HP bun­dle soft­ware to deliver this functionality.

Still noth­ing spe­cial? Okay. How about this.

You can not only use this net­work printer to print, but also to file share and net­work scan.

Yeah. Cool, huh? When­ever you plug a card into the mem­ory slots, it will appear as a net­work drive on Win­dows sys­tems with the HP soft­ware installed (with one caveat, but I’ll get to that soon). I’m not sure what hap­pens with Mac com­put­ers, but I imag­ine it’d be sim­i­lar — we haven’t got any of those here for me to test with, a sit­u­a­tion I’m plan­ning to rem­edy in the near future.

Whilst on the topic of those mem­ory slots, it’s also pos­si­ble to scan on the device direct to the card, so you don’t even need a com­puter with dri­vers for scan­ning. Also, much in the same way as many con­sumer scan­ners have a but­ton you can press to acti­vate scan­ning on your com­puter, this device sim­i­larly allows you to do that — only you’re given a choice of which network-connected com­puter to send the scan to!

Scan­ning needn’t be so com­pli­cated, how­ever. The first thing I did after installing car­tridges was to setup the net­work inte­face man­u­ally to ensure the device had a sta­tic IP and couldn’t get lost on the net­work. In my usual com­pul­sive geek-investigator state, I scanned the ports of that IP (I picked 192.168.0.4, the low­est sta­tic IP still avail­able on my net­work — we also use 192.168.0.101 to 200 for DHCP, but that’s a story for some other time) and dis­cov­ered that in addi­tion to the Jet­Di­rect and Win­dows file shar­ing ports, there was also port 80 open.

Score! I thought, as I hadn’t expected any­thing so civilised as a web inter­face on this thing.

I loaded up the page, and was greeted with this:

A screenshot of the web interface

It gives mis­cel­la­neous infor­ma­tion about the sta­tus of the printer, along with links to var­i­ous other func­tions. The most impor­tant of which is “Scan”.

Click­ing through to “Scan”, I’m greeted with a sim­ple enough screen that offers a choice of image type, and doc­u­ment size. One thing that does suck here is that A4 isn’t an option for the doc­u­ment size, so it’s impos­si­ble to scan the full size of the plate with the web inter­face. Stan­dard desk­top scan­ning soft­ware has no prob­lems, this is just a usabil­ity flaw in the web interface.

You can pre­view your scan in this page, as shown in this screenshot…

Screenshot of preview scan page

…before pro­gress­ing to the actual scan.

This next bit had me con­fused. At first, I thought it just didn’t like Fire­fox — so I walked over to a Win­dows com­puter and gave Inter­net Explorer a go. Same prob­lem. It said the scan had com­pleted suc­cess­fully, but I couldn’t see any­thing. Inter­net Explorer, how­ever, offered a more intru­sive expla­na­tion of what had hap­pened, proudly pro­claim­ing that it had blocked a popup window.

So, back to Fire­fox, I added 192.168.0.4 to the list of allowed popup sites, and all was merry.

The expe­ri­ence has been a mostly pos­i­tive one, with one excep­tion. Their Win­dows XP soft­ware sucks. That needs some qual­i­fi­ca­tion — it only sucks if you’re using it in an envi­ron­ment that has been admin­is­tered cor­rectly. If you’re Joe-my-computer-is-full-of-spyware-from-running-as-administrator-Smith, then you’re in luck (for once): it’ll work fine. But, if you’ve setup user accounts (as could be expected, even in a small net­work envi­ron­ment) that aren’t run­ning as Admin­is­tra­tor (even the Power User group doesn’t work), then you can’t print or scan or read the con­tents of flash disks in the printer.

As I write, there is no known solu­tion to the prob­lem, and what I’ve read would sug­gest that HP are deny­ing such a prob­lem exists. Well, it does, and it isn’t solely because of inept administration.

In all, a good device marred by a few soft­ware flaws. If you’re look­ing for a net­work printer for a non-XP envi­ron­ment, be that ear­lier ver­sions of Win­dows or Mac OS X or a *nix envi­ron­ment, I’d say it’s a great buy. Bonuses are the abil­ity to use the flash card reader on all con­nected com­put­ers, net­work scan­ning, and an LCD pre­view display.

In terms of print qual­ity, the colours are okay, though key (black) isn’t won­der­ful. I’ve only tested on 60GSM paper, though, so that’s obvi­ously a con­tribut­ing fac­tor in my judge­ment. I doubt the qual­ity would be of con­cern to most users, at any rate. It’s more than ade­quate for most desk­top tasks.

Posting from BloGTK 1.1

Just for kicks, to see if it’s any eas­ier than using a plain old web browser to inter­face with the blog!

Any­way, BloGTK is a desk­top client for Word­Press which runs on Linux sys­tems. Nig­gly fea­tures I’ve dis­cov­ered in the last 30 seconds:

  • Can’t select text, then click the “hyper­link” icon, and have the anchor tags wrap around selected text — they appear to the right of it.
  • Com­pul­sory “tar­get” field in anchor gen­er­a­tion — which I don’t think (if I recall cor­rectly) is even valid in XHTML 1.1, pos­si­bly earlier.
  • Lack of built-in quick tags that Word­Press’ own post­ing inter­face has, namely for unordered lists, list items, and tag­ging of abbre­vi­a­tions, etc.
  • Iron­i­cally, it’s pos­si­ble to define your own tags, which can wrap around selected text just fine, whilst the “built-in” anchor but­ton doesn’t do this… Hmm, okay.

It’s really lit­tle things, noth­ing major — the for­mat­ting tags (strong, em, etc.) work just fine on selec­tions, which is great. It also has an inbuilt pre­view which (I’m 99% sure) func­tions using an inter­nal ren­der­ing engine (or part of the GTK toolkit, same thing), rather than mak­ing HTTP calls. A change that’d be inter­est­ing to see (although one which doesn’t affect me directly) would be the imple­men­ta­tion of either a WYSIWYG edi­tor, or sim­ply Tex­tile or Mark­down sup­port with XML­HttpRe­quest being used (or some­thing like it? I gather that’s a JavaScript thing, not hav­ing ever used it, so it mayn’t be usable like that.

Another thing that’d be nice is the imple­men­ta­tion of key­board short­cuts, just for text for­mat­ting stuff — so, Ctrl + B for strong and em tags, etc. And also the chang­ing of the cat­e­gory dis­play to a list of check­boxes in its own frame (or what­ever the term is in desk­top app inter­face design lingo) on the right of the post­ing area, instead of a drop­down — that’d allow posters to select mul­ti­ple cat­e­gories, more rapidly.

It’s a good sim­ple app (sorry… I know it’s prob­a­bly rather unsim­ple when you look at the code dri­ving behind it, but I don’t under­stand any of that Python stuff, so I’m just judg­ing on the inter­face), but a few nig­gly things mean I’d still pre­fer to use the native Word­Press web interface.

Edit: In part to see if it does, but also because I had another thought — the absence of a “Post­ing…” sta­tus win­dow is also some­thing which could be improved, just so the user doesn’t think the appli­ca­tion has crashed. It took a while here due to my ISP’s poor DNS per­for­mance, and had I not known why it was going slowly, I may have closed the appli­ca­tion think­ing it had crashed.

A whole new world of TLAs I don’t understand (Or, Josh wants to install VoIP/Asterisk)

Over the past week or two, I’ve heard about VoIP a bit more than usual, first with Adrian of Beat FM doing his thing over VoIP from Lis­more with FireFly/Freshtel, and then a lit­tle later, when Steve asked if I could join a convo with a guy called Dave to pro­vide some gen­eral Linux advice, as Dave had just installed the Aster­isk PBX soft­ware on a box (or, if you’re Steve, “com­puter”) and needed to SSH into it.

So, awareness/interest cat­a­lysts are there. I’d looked/heard about the Aster­isk soft­ware some time ago, but sort of wrote it off as not quite worth the effort. More recently, how­ever, we’ve been try­ing to get gen­eral ICT stuff sorted for the new place of res­i­dence, in a way that’ll let us cut costs a lit­tle. Read the rest of this entry »