Some reflections on John 16

His dis­ci­ples said, “Ah, now you are speak­ing plainly and not using fig­u­ra­tive speech!”– John 16:29

Yay for clar­ity! You can find the full­text of John 16 here. Apolo­gies for the slight ram­bling­ness of this post. It gains clar­ity towards the end… twas some­what shaped off a Skype con­ver­sa­tion that I haven’t the time nor energy to prop­erly edit at this point :)

John 8:14 is pretty funny in its por­trayal of the sheer incor­rect­ness of the Phar­isees’ asser­tion of the pas­sage prior: It’s like… you can’t speak truth because you’re speak­ing truth about your­self (!!)… and then, fast­for­ward back to 16:30  –  “We know that you know all things and don’t need any­one to ques­tion you; this is why we believe that you came from God” – then, in verse 31, Jesus — “oh, so NOW you get it…”

Verse 32 — “But, seri­ously… yeah, right. Even if you say you do you’re all about to piss­bolt… Oh, that’s now, btw.”

33 — “but I’ve said this stuff so that”… You’ll know after the res­ur­rec­tion what’s going on… The res­ur­rec­tion is the act that will make sense of all of this; there will be no fig­ures of speech because it’s a con­crete demon­stra­tion of what the Christ is achiev­ing — “over­com­ing the world” and bring­ing peace for those who are in him — kinda like way the Father is with Him even when all oth­ers desert

Verse 23 is con­fus­ing… “You won’t ask me any­thing” vs. “My father will give you what­ever you ask in my name”… are they both talk­ing about prayer or is the first talk­ing about information/knowing stuff about Christ’s iden­tity and rela­tion­ship to the Father and the sec­ond talk­ing about prayer?’

Per­haps its about the per­fect suf­fi­ciency of the cross — read­ing 22 AND 23 together:

(Para­phrase of Jesus:) You will be sor­row­ful til I’m back, and then I basi­cally won life (lit­er­ally! haha) and you have a joy that can’t be taken away from you and what you’re ask­ing the Father will be asked in my name!

You’re not try­ing to ask it directly of Him (the Father) any­more. You won’t need to, because you have the Spirit of Christ once Jesus has con­quered death and returned to His Father. What I think that means, in the con­text of the “Spirit of truth” from ear­lier in the pas­sage, is that the things you ASK for are asked as Jesus would (i.e. you’re not stand­ing alone before the father with an impaired rela­tion­ship ask­ing things for your­self once Jesus has con­quered and we’ve received the spirit of truth that speaks what He hears from the Father and Son. Our hearts will desire dif­fer­ent things, and we’ll have a com­plete joy that can’t be taken from us in Christ.

We don’t get the Spirit so we can ask for crap, but so that He can declare what he hears (from the Father) — AND — in verse 14 – 15, His pur­pose is to glo­rify the son, who is King over every­thing that is the Father’s; the Spirit will declare the things of Jesus to his peo­ple. So, ask­ing of the Father “in my name” is about ask­ing to receive joy in full…

“I am not say­ing that I will ask the Father on your behalf” — Does this mean Jesus ISN’T an inter­me­di­ary (as in Hebrews 7:25)? And Romans 8:26 says that the Holy Spirit inter­cedes for us when we don’t know what or how to pray. But this pas­sage (John 16) says that the Holy Spirit will speak only what He hears from the Father and Son: there­fore, His inter­ces­sory prayer for us will nec­es­sar­ily take the shape of prayer for things that God desires. And that should be our prayer always.

Christ needn’t ask the Father on our behalf because His act of death and resurrection/victory OVER death means that our sins have been paid for if we trust in Jesus and call him our Lord. When our sins are paid for, we can be in rela­tion­ship with God the Father and pray to Him; the High Priest that Hebrews 7 talks about is pre­sent­ing us blame­lessly in unblem­ished rela­tion­ship again with God, so we can approach Him. When Christ’s per­fect sac­ri­fice was made, we are able to and should do as the writer of Hebrews says we should in chap­ter 10 of that let­ter: Where there is for­give­ness of sins and law­less­ness, there is no longer any offer­ing for sin. There­fore… let us draw near with a true heart in full assur­ance of faith, with our hearts sprin­kled clean from an evil con­science and our bod­ies washed with pure water.

We are able to draw near to God. Right now this is in the form of prayer to Him and for His pur­poses; that He might achieve them and use His peo­ple to this end in His ser­vice. We don’t need to pray in a church or tem­ple, we don’t need to burn incense or hear music to uplift us — though these things are not intrin­si­cally bad. We have free­dom as we are saved by Christ’s sac­ri­fice for us; we have a new Spirit which He has put in His peo­ple to allow them to draw near to God with­out imped­i­ment or con­stric­tion. We needn’t pray to Christ, because He has opened a new way to the Father for us, hav­ing ful­filled the law of the scrip­tures and mak­ing per­fect that which we (His peo­ple) could not.

God’s pres­ence used to dwell in the holi­est place of the Tem­ple; now, He dwells in the hearts of His peo­ple as Christ has made us His own.

When Jesus says “It is to your advan­tage that I go away”, he means it. If Christ hadn’t gone away from His fol­low­ers to the bru­tal Roman cross to pay for our sins, we would not have peace with God, and there’s no way He could say “I have over­come the world” with­out lying through his teeth unless He faced death and came out the other side, open­ing a new way to God for His people.

An essay on the digital divide

What is the dig­i­tal divide, and what impli­ca­tions for soci­ety and the indi­vid­ual are seen to arise from this?

A rather broad topic, per­haps, but use­ful, nonethe­less. Warn­ing — it’s fairly long.

Update: Now in pretty PDF form! Read the rest of this entry »

The Coming Racism

I had the dis­plea­sure this morn­ing of read­ing an opin­ion piece in the Syd­ney Morn­ing Her­ald enti­tled “The com­ing storm”, in which “IT spe­cial­ist” Gary Ellett bemoans the threat “Chin­dia” dis­plays to Aus­tralia. Quoted, for pur­poses of crit­i­cal review, is the first para­graph of the article:

The glob­al­i­sa­tion jug­ger­naut will be cat­a­strophic for the island con­ti­nent of Aus­tralia. While our eyes are turned to events in the Mid­dle East, an even more per­ni­cious ter­ror has stealth­ily found its way into Aus­tralia. We do not see any news head­lines about it, but grad­u­ally over the last three years, thou­sands of Aus­tralians have lost their liveli­hoods to the hordes from Chin­dia, through out­sourc­ing ser­vices to off­shore companies.

I think I re-read that para­graph three times before finally decid­ing that it wasn’t being far­ci­cal or satir­i­cal, and that the writer was in fact seri­ous. I’m eth­ni­cally not part of the group that Ellett so blithely and flip­pantly attacks, but, as one who belongs to the pop­u­la­tion he claims to rep­re­sent, I’m insulted.

Per­haps the con­tent is valid — off­shoring of jobs results in dimin­ish­ing employ­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties for Aus­tralians. Or not. Read the rest of this entry »

A feast for sore eyes?

Unusual expres­sion though the title of this post may seem (“A feast for sore eyes”), it does make quite a lot of sense once thought about.  It is the amal­ga­ma­tion of the phrases “A sight for sore eyes” and “Feast your eyes on this” — the result of an attempted appli­ca­tion of Australian/English-speaking col­lo­qui­alisms by a foreigner.

Well, okay, not exactly a for­eigner.  An ex-pat of Aus­tralia… not even that!  An Aus­tralian cit­i­zen whose work requires time spent away from this coun­try in a semi-permanent set­ting.  Yes.  Some­thing like that.  Any­way, this man has been liv­ing in France for the past while (thir­teen years? four­teen? I hon­estly can’t recall what he said…), work­ing as a mis­sion­ary there.

Whoa, hang on, Josh… Aus­tralia Chris­tians are send­ing mis­sion­ar­ies to France?  But… isn’t France a coun­try with Chris­t­ian ori­gins and stuff?  Well… sort of.  That doesn’t nec­es­sar­ily result in a sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of peo­ple actu­ally fol­low­ing Jesus, though.  Much of France is either “cul­tur­ally” reli­gious (that is, they fol­low tra­di­tions with­out actu­ally believ­ing [in] the God or entity behind this), athe­ist, or Muslim.

Laws regard­ing sep­a­ra­tion of Church and State in France estab­lish reli­gion as a “pri­vate” thing, not to be shared (and cer­tainly not taught) in the pub­lic sphere.  That said, the Gov­ern­ment in France is very sup­port­ive of the beliefs of the indi­vid­ual, which means that peo­ple (of any faith) can­not be per­se­cuted for this.

So why, then, does our Church send peo­ple to France, if peo­ple are free to believe what they want?  Surely, there are plenty of Chris­tians in France if they can believe what­ever they want?

Well, these mis­sion­ar­ies are liv­ing and work­ing in a city called Toulouse, which has three uni­ver­si­ties, and approx­i­mately 100,000 stu­dents.  Toulouse is one of FOUR uni­ver­sity cities in this region of France, and Owen Chad­wick (the mis­sion­ary) is the only staff-worker work­ing with stu­dents in this area.  So, one to a few hun­dred thou­sand stu­dents kind of ratio.

Yeah.  So, this guy was speak­ing at my church (ESM) this evening, on a pas­sage from a book in the New Tes­ta­ment called Eph­esians.  It was kind of odd, because this is the sort of pas­sage which I’d nor­mally glance at and then skip past… it looks fairly generic and boring.

http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language=english&passage=Eph+1%3A15-23&version=NIV is a link to the pas­sage for any­one inter­ested (Eph­esians 1:15 – 23); it is a very excit­ing prayer, but I’d man­aged to com­pletely miss this until it was pre­sented tonight.

So what’s so excit­ing about it?  It’s ask­ing for “the Spirit of wis­dom and revelation” — okay, so that means some­thing has to be there to be revealed, that we don’t know about or aren’t aware of, right?  The speaker likened us to being in a black­out, mov­ing to the walls and feel­ing they were smooth.  Hang on, we’re in a crumbly sand­stone build­ing!  That’s not right!  And if the walls were made from gold ingots, we wouldn’t know — it’s the same with Chris­tians if God doesn’t reveal his riches to us.

And THAT is a good thing because…?  What’s there that is so good, so worth know­ing about?  Back towards the start of Eph­esians (Eph­esians 1:3), the writer of this let­ter, Paul, says “Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heav­enly realms with every spir­i­tual bless­ing in Christ.”

EVERY bless­ing.  So it’s not like a stack of gold piled around the walls.  It’s much, much big­ger.  It’ll prob­a­bly stay shiny for longer, too.

# by Josh on August 22nd, 2004 Tags: , , , ,
| No Comments »