08 Oct 2005
I logged into my GMail account today and noticed that a message from a Yahoo! user account was authenticated using SPF, or Sender Policy Framework, and was marked as such when you click “More options”. They’ve probably been doing this for a while, but I only just realised.
Another thing they’ve got going is user aliasing… for example, I signed up for “josh.street” and received an email to JoshStreet (and since email addresses are effectively lowercase, that means joshstreet). Obviously I’m not posting my email address in parsable format (because spammers have programs to harvest email addresses off websites), but the domain is gmail.com, so that’s not too hard to figure out if you want to send me email now is it?
08 Oct 2005
anyway, i’ve been using firefox for like at least a year now cos of all the silly things attached to internet explorer.. actually it was my brother who downloaded it.. but yeh it’s pretty good!
Kim, via email. It’s funny, because I still have to file this post under “Geek”. Time to ditch the categories for freeform tags, methinks!
06 Oct 2005
We picked up a second-hand Gateway computer around the beginning of the year (it’s great build quality, and uses less than 90W of power… but if any of the components in it died we might be a bit screwed! Mind you, at least it has plenty of PCI slots, unlike some.), along with its original monitor, a 15″ Gateway EV500.
I’m pretty sure they were rebadging Sony monitors even when this thing was made, so it’s probable there’s another model number that goes with it, but perhaps not. Basically, I used it because it went with the computer and, at that time, we didn’t have any other spare monitors of any decent quality.
This screen is okay in terms of resolutions/refresh rate support (it does 1024×768 at 85Hz, which is very good for a cheap vendor from the late 90s — and yes, it was cheap — this is a Celeron 400MHz system, though we’ve pumped up the RAM from probably 64MB or (optimistically) 128MB to 256MB to make it usable with XP. It is, however, rather blurry.
Or, was. We acquired it just as we moved into this house, so I didn’t really have a lot of time to spend just setting it up properly… I was trying to get, you know, four other computers and the network setup, whilst working out how to configure the phone system… oh, yeah, and I had to move into my bedroom at some point, too (in actual fact I still haven’t unpacked all the boxes… there is one or two remaining but I know what’s in them and they’re being stored in the bottom of a wardrobe, so that’s okay!)… basically I threw it on the desk and plugged it in, formatted and installed XP, made some trivial administrative software changes (probably via RDC because hot desking is, like, so much easier than turning around and using another KVM setup!), and promptly forgot about it.
So today I actually had to use it for a bit and its blurriness irritated me enough to bother doing something about it. It’s got one of those doors that covers controls and pops open to reveal a rotary switch that doubles as a button, so I did that seeing if there was anything I could do to fix it in there. Alas, no software focus utilities to be found (must poke a screwdriver in the back of it sometime), though, importantly, there are both Vertical and Horizontal Moire adjustments available under the More option from the core menu. This monitor had a fairly significant moire problem (I’m not sure if I’m using that term correctly, though I know the problem was with that), so playing with these settings for a bit made its lots more pleasant to use.
Admittedly, its focus towards the edges drops off fairly significantly, but that could be an unavoidable limitation of the device (that is, it’s a curved CRT display… so the focal length physically does change fairly significantly).
05 Oct 2005
Makes you wonder how I ever managed to fit a conventional screen on there, doesn’t it?
05 Oct 2005
They said it was faulty. A new one arrives tomorrow. I’m expecting similar problems in about six months time based on Michael’s advice this malady afflicts many 8ms monitors, but hey, I’m happy with the fast turnaround right now. And six months time might be excuse occasion enough for a new screen, anyway. (Notably, I’ve never had any residual image/burn-in/”image persistance” problems with our slightly-older 19″ Benq. As a byproduct of its vintage, it’s a 25ms display and is hence less susceptible to such problems.)
Now I need to find room on my desk to put the monitor back again!