I’ve delivered simple, clear and easy-to-use services for 20 years, for startups, scaleups and government. I write about the nerdy bits here.
— @joahua
Technology is wonderful…
[17:34:27] Josh: Can you plug a mic into them or is it just the inbuilt thing?
[17:34:32] Viktorya: Zens do EVERYTHING
[17:34:40] Viktorya: Apparently it wont turn on though.
[17:34:43] Viktorya: I dunno
Everything but switching on. Cool.
I can’t believe how much I seem to be posting about this class of late, but it just keeps producing such hilarious material! Our teacher decided to… get into the spirit of things, and dramatise a poem somewhat too much. The following is what ensued:
There was going to be video, but the quality of the audio was too poor and I couldn’t cut together anything interesting enough to justify publishing – apologies. However, despite this, the last three stills are captures from video.
Despite more than 60,000 students in NSW doing their HSC this year, the first three personal timetables listed when a Google search for “HSC timetable” is conducted are those of people known to me. My timetable is ranking highest, probably because of incoming links and the relative freshness of information, then Dale’s from last year (ranked not far below, probably because of relative age of the document), then, on the next page, Ben’s timetable posted a few days ago – I’d imagine because of incoming links, though the fact it’s not in a table may have something to do with it.
Does that strike anyone else as scary? I’m so sure we can’t be the only people in the state (of approximately 6.6 million people) to have posted their timetables online! And, if we are, that we all know each other directly – it’s a scary extrapolation of the idea of a “digerati” into a broader context! Have we formed our own élite? Does that make us relatively “heard” voices in this global community?
Call this an overreaction to search engine optimisation if you will, but I think it’s significant that three students (or ex-students) in the state who all know each other can rank so highly on a term hardly common to them alone – there is a candidature of approximately 60,000 students, and then there are the relatives and friends of these people to consider. Don’t laugh at this comment too hard, but where are the LiveJournal users on the first two pages? Certainly, someone must have posted such information, or, at the very least, a string referring to the same, on their own website.
“Democracy” on the web takes on a new tone when viewed like this. Creation of some compelling content in a semantic framework apparently entitles one to a greater voice on any issue. There are technical limitations to doing it any other way, of course – but perhaps this suggests that “the web” isn’t quite so democratic as it has often been heralded.
Never try and objectively write fictionally about a situation you are inextricably involved in and hope for any kind of literary success. It doesn’t happen, even when you change names, genders, places – if, in your mind, the plot-idea is tied to real-world events, your ability to elaborate cohesively and with any degree of eloquence will be compromised, and your “work of fiction” will become a drone-like recount sounding like the work of a child in year 3 (or thereabouts).
Speaking from personal experience and a comprehensive-ish remodelling of an Extension 2 major-work plot, that is…
…you start typing your password into a Unix prompt and press Tab to command complete.
Good night!
